Discussion in 'Prevx Releases' started by Thankful, Jul 14, 2012.
Personally I don't, I have no use for MRG!
+1 not needed. Notice F-Secure, G-Data and SAS are also no longer participating.
Unfortunate error (typo?) by Chris here in reply to BoerenkoolMetWorst also, for some reason: http://www.blog.mrg-effitas.com/mrg-effitas-flash-test-29-06-2012/
Ultimately it's up to Webroot but I hope they stay away from MRG and this is my opinion as I speak for myself and no one else!
Given the past problems with this testing organization I am not surprised they decided not to include WSA due to "resources" issues
I think they do a decent job in showing us strengths and weaknesses in different products.
If the BBC trusts them, then so do I. I also think it's worth mentioning that they always gave Prevx decent reviews in the past.
I would like them to participate in MRG's tests. BTW, Prevx 3.0 has been one of the top scorers in their tests for quite a while, they declined somewhat in the months before WSA's public beta, but still scored allright.
Some communication problems and misunderstandings around the faliure of PREVX/WSA and the simulator. There has been some exchange between MRG and PREVXHELP. Nothing serious but I would not be surprised that this may have influenced the sudden drop of PREVX/WSA due to "resource" issues. We are all humans... it can happen. Oh, wait.... may be the selection of the security tools to test was done by alphabetic order?
Yea, problems and misunderstandings are only things god invented for us to solve
Let´s hope WSA will participate in these tests, I find them just as refreshing as the samples in the tests are.
I honestly don't care if WSA participates in the MRG Flash Tests or not. There, I said it. As long as my WSA Essential's protected systems stay malware free (which they have so far), that is all that really matters to me in the long-run.
Separate names with a comma.