I request the administrators/moderators to clarify few below mentioned sections: 1. Are the members entitled to freely express their views about various security products, based purely on facts? (However, the language of the post is purely decent and non-offensive.) 2. Every developer of a Software product always takes a defensive stance on the criticism of their product's flaws and drawbacks, so why there is no availability of protection to the members who are a victim of developer's suppression/imperialism/false-accusations...just because they posted a thread which is not in favour of the Software's marketing? 3. Is Wilders Security Forum purely meant for marketing proposes? (With reference to the suppression of X product's criticism.) 4. If there is a disagreement regarding a post between a Developer and a member, why in majority of the cases the thread is altered (includes closing, modifying and deleting the post/thread) in favor of the Developer? 5. I would be great if the Forum has a section that clarifies whether the hired Moderators/Administrators are not paid for moderating the forum by X Software firm. And if they are paid, please reveal it openly.