hyperjacking is no threat

Discussion in 'malware problems & news' started by Meriadoc, Jul 6, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Meriadoc

    Meriadoc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Posts:
    2,642
    Location:
    Cymru
    zdnet
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2007
  2. coolbluewater

    coolbluewater Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Posts:
    268
    Location:
    next door to Redmond
    Rutkowska isn't the only one losing by not getting her $384,000.
    It will soon be boo-hoo time for the AV/AS companies too, who will stand to lose millions. By Ptacek et cie. demonstrating protection for a bloated OS that's swiss-cheesed by design, you can also add M$ into the fold, as they will be essentially be using virtualization as the answer to protect it.
    For those who don't virtualize Windows, either from EULA adherence or lack of an alternate OS, it will remain the $$$ game - newer hardware, AV/AS/paid apps and the OS itself, and still worry about getting pwn3d. For those who do virtualize, if the host OS is still a Windows version, then you're only as safe as your host OS.
    Or, let's see... use Linux (free), run VMware/VirtualBox (if needed; free) and if anything manages to go wrong (if ever), boot from a Live CD (free) and fix whatever happened.
    Ya gotta love it when well-intentioned people going after a hacker, just to blow their own horn will manage to sound a wake-up call to those being legally fleeced.
    The fact that Ferrie works for Symantec and will be part of the show will make it even more humorous.
     
  3. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    8,694
    Hello,
    Follow the money ... sounds familiar?
    Cheers all,
    Mrk
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.