How good is now Dr. Web ? because I want to buy it

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by zorro zorrito, Apr 4, 2016.

  1. zorro zorrito

    zorro zorrito Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Posts:
    149
    About 10 years ago I used dr. web in my pc, but now I don't know how good it is. (security space).
     
  2. jjc225

    jjc225 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Posts:
    224
    It's quite good. I use it on two of my computers, and got some great deals which allowed multiple year purchases on both. I have over 800 days of subscription on both licenses. The time on the full scan has improved with this version 11, but of course this also has to do with the processing speed of the computer. With an Intel Core I7 the scan finishes in about two hours. Protection is very good. Some say the web filter is a bit aggressive, and perhaps it is. Overall, though, quite solid.
     
  3. Moose World

    Moose World Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Posts:
    446
    Location:
    U.S. Citizen
  4. daman1

    daman1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Posts:
    769
    Location:
    MICHIGAN,USA
    No problems here with Bitdefender. o_O
     
  5. zorro zorrito

    zorro zorrito Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Posts:
    149
    Thanks for the answers, Moose World is interesting what you say about ransomware, and I searched some information at Dr.Web and they say that they are one of the best to give better results about cryptolockers, even they have a manual to configure they product for better results, I downloaded and I am going to read it. here is the link:
    https://antifraud.drweb.com/encryption_trojs/?lng=en

    Thanks, I wait for more points of view.
     
  6. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    8,026
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I don't know about the AV, but the HIPS is quite bad.
     
  7. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    1,915
    AFAIK they don't participate in any tests like AV-test or AV-comparatives.
     
  8. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,531
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
  9. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,010
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    About 10 years ago, Dr Web was considered a very good choice as an AV; lightweight, great heuristics and cleaning abilities. It was also tested on the main sites.

    Nowadays, IME, SpIDer Gate for web protection can be a little heavy and too sensitive and although the AV part continues to run very light on most systems and has a number of "new" protective techniques, its recent lack of proper testing and its still slow scanner are drawbacks.

    As mentioned above, you can pick up cheap licenses now but IMO, there are much better free and retail alternatives to Dr Web nowadays. But no harm in giving it a whirl as a trial.
     
  10. gery

    gery Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Posts:
    1,785
    Dr web has some good protection capabilities but it is quite heavy. I would rather go with something else. Nut you have to try for yourself. Try something like webroot linked to a strong firewall and eset antivirus
     
  11. coolcfan

    coolcfan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Posts:
    123
    In a thread I read recently, Dr. Web, Trend, BD2017 Beta and Mcafee Cloud AV is the only 4 which completely prevented a new ransomware from encrypting any file. Many other AVs kill the ransomware after it encrypts some files, which is a bit too late.
     
Loading...