How far should organizations be able to go to defend against cyberattacks?

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by Minimalist, Feb 15, 2019.

  1. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,883
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    https://phys.org/news/2019-02-defend-cyberattacks.html
     
  2. itman

    itman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Posts:
    8,593
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Bad move ……….

    I remember back when the LifeLock founder would taunt hackers by challenging them the to hack him personally. And that is just what they did.

    The last thing a corp. needs to do is to "wave the red flag" in regards to retaliatory actions. No one is able to sustain a coordinated and target business attack without major negative operational effects. Stick with the "best offense is a strong defense" approach. The attacker will give up and search for other more vulnerable targets.

    What I do support is a coordinated law enforcement and business approach where any punitive action is done by law enforcement. Businesses are lacking in this area for fear of public disclosure and the impact that may have. Also the introduction of much longer prison sentences and extensive forfeiture of property and financial assets against those convicted. And since the Internet is worldwide, nations must join to combat this epidemic.

    Finally there is the issue of existing financial mechanisms that encourage criminal activities such as Bitcoin and the like.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2019
  3. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Well, hacking back can be fun. And it provides gainful employment to those who might otherwise be hacking in. So a win-win, no?
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.