Hijack this' closed?

Discussion in 'General Topics' started by Jimbob1989, Dec 28, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jimbob1989

    Jimbob1989 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Posts:
    2,529
  2. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
  3. Jimbob1989

    Jimbob1989 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Posts:
    2,529
    Thanks Bubba, in the threads I could find, posted by LowWaterMark, there was no real explanation given, it was only when asked that LowWaterMark explained the reasons for doing so. Maybe LowWaterMark would like to include that in his announcement.

    Found the thread I needed now though, thanks again.

    Jimbob
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2004
  4. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    Perhaps you did not read the link I provided or you need to take your time and read the info in the link I provided. LWM not only gave the reason for stopping HJT log processing but also provided comments of why it was not mentioned in the Announcement.

    said by LWM in the above link:
    "I wanted to keep the Announcement itself as clean and on-point as possible, so I didn't put the reason in there."
     
  5. Jimbob1989

    Jimbob1989 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Posts:
    2,529
    The link is not a sticky, have to search deep to find it. If you didn't know where to look, you wouldn't know.

    Jimbob
     
  6. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    Which is why you asked the question JimBob and an answer by an Admin was given via a link. Not sure what else your needing JimBob....but if you think all reasoning posts by Admins can be made sticky's....that's illogical....or....are you just attempting to be argumentative this AM :)
     
  7. Jimbob1989

    Jimbob1989 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Posts:
    2,529
    Just some feedback, wondered if it would be usefull having the reasoning behind it in the same sticky as the announcement.

    Jimbob
     
  8. MickeyTheMan

    MickeyTheMan Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    1,016
    It was deemed not to be. That ist that , let's move on please.
     
  9. nadirah

    nadirah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    3,647
    Wilders security forums does not support cleaning or analysing hijackthis logs anymore, and thats final. I feel there's no need to kick up a fuss or ask any questions about it. What has happened has already happened. This thread might as well end up being closed for good.
     
  10. Jimbob1989

    Jimbob1989 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Posts:
    2,529
    nadirah I'm not arguing against its closure, just saying it might be better if the thread regarding its closure included a little more detail.

    Jimbob
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.