help to configure Process Explorer

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by mantra, Apr 14, 2023.

  1. mantra

    mantra Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Posts:
    6,195
    Hi
    i have used for a lot of time process hacker , and seeing it's outdated
    i want to use Process Explorer v17.04 , i have downloaded 64bit and 32bit

    I miss some process hacker information ,like Relative Start Time (when a program started for example 45 mintues ago , Elevation high -> administrator
    and others columns that i can't find on process Process Explorer

    and can i ask you if does it use a driver?
    because i can not find it
    I remember i own a driver , I run under w7 64bit and w10 64bit , i guess PROCEXP that could not be deleted

    thanks
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2023
  2. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
  3. mantra

    mantra Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Posts:
    6,195
    Hi @Wallaby
    but is still portable?
    i have seeing PROCEXP of process explorer could not be deleted , i have tried on w7 with registry finder as administrator
    Code:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Enum\Root\LEGACY_PROCEXP152
    about the new version and name of process hacker ,system informer can import the old process hacker settings?
    thanks
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2023
  4. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
  5. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    3,367
    Location:
    Italy
    My favorite use with PE is to set it up as in the image below:

    1.jpg
     
  6. mantra

    mantra Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Posts:
    6,195
    hi @Sampei Nihira
    have you tested under w7 , it does create a driver called LEGACY_PROCEXP152 or PROCEXP152 , i'm talking about is process explorer
    what do you mean for "use with PE"?
    thanks
    Hi @Wallaby
    about system informer should i delete SystemInformer.sys ?
    about process hacker (no more avaible )to make portable should be deleted the file a sys file
    by the way process hacker is flagged by virus total as malware by 27 AV :thumbd:
    thanks
     
  7. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,812
    Location:
    .
    What differences, pros and cons, you notice between SI and PE?
    I'm thinking to use portable SI.
    TIA
     
  8. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,108
    Location:
    UK
  9. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
    It is only a change of name because Process "HACKER" was too scary
    Same developers same... everything
    Read here
    https://github.com/winsiderss/systeminformer/discussions/1577

    PS
    The new driver SystemInformer.sys was signed by Microsoft
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2023
  10. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
    No
    Just copy the whole folder "amd64" (I am on a Windows 10 Home 64bit) somewhere and launch SystemInformer.exe

    PS
    The other folders inside the zip file are for x86 and for Arm64 CPU's

    PPS
    Here
    https://github.com/PrxyHunter/GeoLite2/releases/latest
    you can find the file GeoLite2-Country.mmdb
    that if you want to display Country flags in the Network "tag" has to be put into the "installation" folder
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2023
  11. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,812
    Location:
    .
    Thanks but I meant:
    Process Explorer I meant, not Process Hacker.
     
  12. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
    I have never gone too deep in the knowledge of the two's, but as far as I am concerned both Process Explorer and System Informer do exactly the same things.
    I prefer System Informer for its graphic design (= I like the way it looks compared to Process Explorer)

    Let other guys more expert than me to tell more precise characteristics.
     
  13. mantra

    mantra Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Posts:
    6,195
    hi @stapp
    thanks for
    Hi @Wallaby @Mr.X
    but are you sure is it portable?
    and is in night version too , a beta version
    thansk
    hi @Sampei Nihira
    how can i remove that registry key ?
    thanks
     
  14. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
    It is portable, I am using it regularly.
    Even if it is a nightly build it is stable, they make lots uf updates.
     
  15. mantra

    mantra Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Posts:
    6,195
    hi
    well I will keep SystemInformer.sys , even i don't know why it does need it , it works even if you rename it
    is there a way to let have the red color on virus total when is > than 1?
    thanks Wallaby
     
  16. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    203
    I don't know
    Maybe it is better if you ask them on github
    Have a nice day

    PS
    Just pay attention, when you are extracting a new version from the "binaries" zip file, that there is also a 0 byte "SystemInformer.exe.settings.xml"
    So don't select it and don't overwrite your SystemInformer.exe.settings.xml (or just make a copy of your SystemInformer.exe.settings.xml somewhere just in case...) :)
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2023
  17. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    system informer rox, process explorer is not that good any longer, dropped.

    in special for PE there exist no option to disable this stupid VT requesting, system informer has, and much more. and its portable. /me using the latest build, means beta, working without issues.
    https://systeminformer.sourceforge.io/nightly.php (same as above)

    SI is still using a SYS file driver, but its no longer flagged from windows defender.
     
  18. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    3,440
    Location:
    Slovakia
    But it is not available yet, setup neither exe are not signed, I can not run SI as admin without disabling ValidateAdminCodeSignatures.
    So is SI as of now, "only" by 15 AVs though.
    Code:
    https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/072bb6f412b64bba338a20603fcc65c512ae73c4ee86f9ead3c39155d4d3af53
    Is it not SI based on PE's source code?
     
  19. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,812
    Location:
    .
    Amusingly, arm64 version gets flagged only by one A/V.
     
  20. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    either you meant processhacker, or i am clueless because i dont know.
    i switched to processhacker since 2.39 final, turned to nightly and then to systeminformer.
    the only tool from sysinternales i currently use is "process monitor" for investigations, but not more.
     
  21. mantra

    mantra Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Posts:
    6,195
    hi
    but send to virus total doesn't work on process hacker and systeminformer last build
    maybe they have not fixed
     
  22. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    3,440
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Sending to other scanners work, but if you have VT enabled, you do not really need it?
     

    Attached Files:

  23. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    pardon?
    but yes, i dont need VT because any software here is trusted and was under review* before.

    *sandboxie is part of this procedure.

    VT is for scary or paranoid users i think, it does not really have effects for regular and concient users.
    results are a list for 60+ scanners and a lot of there are more than futile and neither nor relevant.
    i guess this is one reason that VT results are not allowed here - too many fud.
     
  24. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,812
    Location:
    .
    I just see VT's Kasperskys and Esets engine results to get more confidence on a file :D
     
  25. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,108
    Location:
    UK
    I absolutely adore Macrium Reflect. This morning I had made an image. This afternoon I decided to give Systeminformer.bin.zip a try out after getting it from here
    https://systeminformer.sourceforge.io/nightly.php

    My machine hated it from the start and went wild :D Popups everywhere etc so I pressed the magic Macrium button and I am back on dry land again.
    No idea what happened, however I don't think it was malware, it was just my system just didn't seem like it.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.