Ghostery

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by vincenzo, Apr 5, 2015.

  1. vincenzo

    vincenzo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Posts:
    151
    If Ghostery is set to block all cookies and trackers, is it redundant to also set the browser to block 3rd party cookies? I've always thought so, but an article I read seems to imply you should do that.

    Thanks
     
  2. MisterB

    MisterB Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Posts:
    1,267
    Location:
    Southern Rocky Mountains USA
    Redundancy is always good. Extensions can be compromised and disabled by malware. I haven't seen it happen with Ghostery but I have with Ad-Block plus. By setting the browser to block 3rd party cookies, you've added another layer of security that covers the same problem. If one fails, the other one is still there.
     
  3. Wroll

    Wroll Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Posts:
    549
    Location:
    Italy
    3rd party cookies are useless and all programs that relay on lists to be updated are at some point outdated.
     
  4. vincenzo

    vincenzo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Posts:
    151
    OK thanks for the info.
     
  5. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    3,432
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Some webpages do not work properly without 3rd party cookies. I let the extension delete them periodically and then there is CCleaner and similar.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.