Freeware AV, choice considerations

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Kees1958, Jan 31, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    cmon Hermes, your recommending
    clam now?

    I thought you knew about secuirty.
     
  2. computer geek

    computer geek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Posts:
    776
    clam... so? give it another couple of years before you start criticising it i would. :)
     
  3. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    no thanks, think i will criticize it right now.

    its crap and always has been, its open source so dont expect any kind of technologys (or good ones) being introduced.

    sure, they could improve their detection only...... but this does not mean security.
     
  4. computer geek

    computer geek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Posts:
    776
    :p :p :p disagree completely mate. i know its open source, but i will say it is crap in 3 years time if it is. :)
     
  5. Hermescomputers

    Hermescomputers Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Posts:
    1,069
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada, eh?
    Hahaha.... Just love to steer the pot! :D

    Keep in mind, I didn't recommend it, I simply posted information about it and asked what you peeps think of it...

    Ya'd think someone might of liked it... Some are actually using it as their main AV, what I'm interested in is what others like me actually see out there.

    I don't have firm numbers but even though I see it used on some system it probably is in the area of less than 3 % of systems we work on... not much actually.

    I see it used most on USB sticks as www.portableapps.org. Which means many are likely using it professionally in the field as a secondary virus cleaner or at the very least to mop up infections on friends and family's infected computers...

    You can read about right here: http://portableapps.com/news/2008-01-22_-_clamwin_portable_0.92

    Any Opinions about it on this type of use?
     
  6. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    ok, go ahead and use it, its your machine.

    -------

    they have already had more than 3 years........
     
  7. jdd58

    jdd58 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Posts:
    556
    Location:
    Sonoran Desert
    I thought the same thing. After checking I found you can indeed block avnotify.exe with Vista Home Premium. Works great.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 3, 2008
  8. EliteKiller

    EliteKiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Posts:
    1,138
    Location:
    TX
    IMO people that use ClamAV are not malware removal experts, and they have not spent time researching other viable alternatives that actually clean and remove nasty infections. ;) If you want a portable AV then stick with Kaspersky's AVPTool or Dr. Web's CureIt. Both are updated several times each day (you must download the latest version manually) and run circles around ClamAV.
     
  9. jdd58

    jdd58 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Posts:
    556
    Location:
    Sonoran Desert
    Hello Kees

    In order of importance to me:

    1. Ratings in respected tests
    2. Ability to exclude folders
    3. Ability to prompt or quarantine rether than delete
    4. CPU hog/boot delay
    5. Heuristics
    6. Completeness
    7. Update frequency

    In recommending to others:
    1. Least likelyhood of phone calls to me.
    2. Usually the age/speed of the computer is a factor.
    3. The ability of the person to tolerate Avira's popup.
    (My wife thought I had been surfing for porn on her computer after seeing an Avira popup with a blowup doll in the ad!) Needless to say She got Avast installed pronto and she has been happy ever since.

    Generally I recommend to all who are less computer savvy, one of the three AV's, SAS, BOclean, and I never hear from them again.
     
  10. computer geek

    computer geek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Posts:
    776
    not that i want to use it... Maybe in a couple of years. ;)
     
  11. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,224
    Hello,
    I'm gonna spice the argument some more:
    Does it really matter what AV is used?
    Mrk
     
  12. Hermescomputers

    Hermescomputers Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Posts:
    1,069
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada, eh?

    eh, thanks for the advice but I have never even tried using it for this purpose... :)

    Depends on the infection...
     
  13. ltGuillaume

    ltGuillaume Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1
    Is AVG still the one with least CPU hogging? Avira is known to be one of the fastest on-demand scanners with an exceptionally high detection rate, but I wouldn't know whether that's a guarantee for a fast on-access scanner. Has there been any test with opening/copying a great diversity of files from one place to another while having the different resident shields active?
     
  14. sukarof

    sukarof Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Posts:
    1,887
    Location:
    Stockholm Sweden
    I choose AV after these criterias:

    1. I want a AV that doesnt access the hard drive constantly or impact on system performance otherwise.
    2. It doesnt hurt if it does good on tests but no need to be on the top since I am not exposed to malware and I run limited user anyway.
    Well thats about it and Avast is the one that meet those demands best.
     
  15. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Suckaroff,
    Agree after reducing standard shieldf operation to write only (disabling execuition control and read)
     
  16. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    2,201
    Re: Freeware AV, choise considerations

    Partial quote above.

    Not a rescource hog ?

    Then why do I experience 100 % or near 100 % CPU cycles for a few minutes the first time I active the computer on any given day ? Mostly Microsoft, and in particular, McAfee phoning home.

    I just checked the number of applications mentioned in the firewall list. A few real/extra applications, but there are 53 ! Even though programs like Acrobat Reader are not listed there, since I give those programs only temporary access (exceptions). It's massive. Mostly McAfee stuff, and some windows things, probably also related to McAfee.

    And btw, I have 512 MB RAM, and although this computer is a few years old, the CPU has no problems with other software.
     
  17. L815

    L815 Guest

    I also found the solution. Fairly easy too.
     
  18. Xenophobe

    Xenophobe Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Posts:
    174
    It's too bad it also blocks the functionality of looking up viruses straight from AntiVir. :doubt:
     
  19. Dieselman

    Dieselman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Posts:
    795
    Free should be free. Period. I use to use AVG free and it was ok. Then I tried AntiVir and the nag upgrade screen was a pain as well as the slow updates. Then I switched to Avast. Fast updates and no nag screen. I am now using NOD32 but when its expired I will be going back to Avast. I have Avast on my laptop at work.
     
  20. L815

    L815 Guest

    I haven't gotten any detections in a while, so this function isn't in need yet :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.