firefox adblock plus subscriptions vS ad muncher both necessary ?

HI

is it necessary to use both ad muncher + fire fox ad block + (subscriptions) ??
coz its seems ad muncher block the crap faster than firefox adblock plus.

what u guys think?

 

Just add firefox to your filter targets and you will be fine. No need for ab+ then.

 

what do u mean? add firefox ?? ad muncher filter the url with out any adjustment

and ad muncher cost $$$ ab + zero

 

I use both but with a twist. I use the standard Ad Muncher setup with up-to-date definitions. But I also use ABP with Element Hiding Helper to block a few things that still come through. Element Hiding Helper is incredibly easy to use and I highly recommend it if you have some issues with ads and don't want to write (or learn how to write) filter rules. (I do not use any other filtering set with ABP besides Element Hiding Helper.)

 

doesn't using both make heavy on load pages or browsing speed?

 

I dont recommend ad-muncher ,if u have correct mozilla addons.because ad-muncher tough very good at blocking ads, gave problems when loading flash and using scrips in browsers in several webpages.

After adblock+and filtersetupdater no ads at all

 

If it does, I don't see it. When I use my laptops on a T-1, things are similar to other machines I see on the network.

 

u can always exclude web pages from being filtered

 

didn't say it slow the browsing mate , just a logical remark

 

Then my exclusion list will grow dynamically and soon become more annoying than the popups itself .I have done away with ad-munch.I works great for IE though.

 

and also for firefox plugin "ie tab" which adb+ doesnt have any effect on it