Happiness everywhere. Behold, a long, negative review of Fedora 28 KDE, tested in a dual-boot setup on a laptop with Nvidia graphics, covering live session, installation and a partial post-install usage, including look & feel, fonts, networking - Wireless, Bluetooth, Samba sharing, printing, multimedia support - MP3 playback and HD video, partitioning, customization, numerous application crashes, errors and bugs, broken smartphone support, and a dead desktop after graphics drivers installation. Take a look. https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/fedora-28-kde.html Cheers, Mrk
It's always interesting how perceptions vary. I'm absolutely happy with Fedora 28 KDE. However, I hadn't installed it anew but performed a release-upgrade from v. 27. Perhaps this makes a difference.
It's not a perception. All of the problems come with errors, popups, crashes. My test methods remain unchanged. I am highly consistent in what I do. What changes is the seesaw of bugs and regressions and quality in the distros. Mrk
Personally, I'm curious in Fedora Atomic Workstation. Could you review that? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AtomicWorkstation
I'll see what I can do. Will you believe me that I have more than a year's worth of requests in my todo list? Mrk
My installation of F28 KDE 64 bit was a total disaster and a waste of time. Same thing happens with F28 Cinnamon and F28 Workstation Netinst. The Live DVD boots into a wall of text. Then after a very long wait, the screen shows "Input not supported". This is not the first time I install Fedora. I always verify SHA256 checksums before burning ISO images to disks. My PC has an AMD Phenom II X2 CPU, 8 GB DDR3 RAM and a GeForce GT710 video card. It's not that old and it has a multiboot of Windows 7, openSUSE Leap 15.0, Xubuntu 18, Mint 19, F28 Xfce and SolydK 9.