FBI: Monitoring Skype and Gmail are "top priority" in 2013

Discussion in 'privacy general' started by dogbite, Mar 29, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dogbite

    dogbite Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2012
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    EU
  2. I wonder how they expect to deal with the resulting infoglut.
     
  3. DesuMaiden

    DesuMaiden Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2013
    Posts:
    534
    Don't they have key work filters?

    They have more than enough man power and resources to sort out the potentially dangerous data.
     
  4. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    I'll be mentioning airplanes, C4 and USA every day in my mails. In fact i'll put this in my mail signature. Their keyword detectors will go mad :D
     
  5. Mman79

    Mman79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    2,016
    Location:
    North America
    Um, actually, no they don't. Especially not in manpower. There are keywords of course, but keywords have never been the only criteria for logging data in these systems and looking at the data twice. More on topic, I'm not at all surprised they want to watch over Skype and Gmail. Of course this means what enough people have known all along, Google is very friendly with LEA, and their public PR moments with all of this "They'll need a warrant for us to hand over anything about you" is a bunch of nonsense.
     
  6. Mman79

    Mman79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    2,016
    Location:
    North America
    It would be hilarious to do that if they still weeded out the obvious trolls from the real threats. Now they whisk you off to a dark cell whether you were "funning" them or not. See you in the new Guantanamo :D
     
  7. noone_particular

    noone_particular Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    3,798
    IMO it's an ideal response if done on a large enough scale. Locking up a few dozen or a hundred is one thing. Get several thousand involved and it becomes nearly impossible to lock them up covertly.
     
  8. dogbite

    dogbite Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2012
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    EU
    Especially if someone does not live in the US...
     
  9. Techwiz

    Techwiz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Posts:
    539
    Location:
    United States
    Keep in mind that if anyone has or is hoping to one day have a security clearance that the government evaluates what you post online and what kind of activity you have in your e-mail. But I fully agree, that the best way to defeat agencies that utilize these tactics is if we ban together and make the process of decrypting web traffic so costly and time consuming that the entire process becomes rather unproductive. The same philosophy is applied when waging wars, so why not apply it to the war on privacy? Even if they make an example of a select few individuals they are only going encourage more support on our end.
     
  10. JRViejo

    JRViejo Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    20,918
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Removed Off Topic Posts.
     
  11. siljaline

    siljaline Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,619
  12. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    4,948
    Location:
    USA
    I wish them luck. I don't agree with backdooring software, but if someone is stupid enough to use Skype or Gmail for terrorist type activities then they deserve what's coming to them! The world would be such a better place without them!
     
  13. caspian

    caspian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Posts:
    2,301
    Location:
    Oz
    If that was the only access that all of these new powers would grant, and if there were safe guards and accountability, then I would not mind at all. I don't like terrorists either. And I love being able to speak freely and live as a free man. So a terrorist is my enemy. So just as long as their are rules to follow that prevent abuse then I'm okay with it.

    But this doesn't appear to be the case. And the more they do away with oversight and accountability, the more they open that door for mischief of all types. I bet even N. security letters have even been used for personal reasons. It wouldn't surprise me one bit. And spying to help out a friend or relative. To promote a personal political agenda. Or spying just for the helll of it. I bet it's all been done.
     
  14. PaulyDefran

    PaulyDefran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Posts:
    1,163
    "Terrorists"....Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    (Not political, it's only one word, used in the original article, and then digitally simulated laughter).

    PD
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.