false postives at Ecoustics.com

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by alglove, Sep 20, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. alglove

    alglove Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Posts:
    904
    Location:
    Houston, Texas, USA
    I have encountered problems when reading certain reviews posted at the Ecoustics.com website. In particular, whenever I try to read any review that comes to Ecoustics from "Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity" magazine ( http://www.hometheaterhifi.com ), I am bomarded with JS/TrojanDropper.Tivso.gen and TrojanDownloader.Tivso.gen messages, and I am unable to read the review.

    I am pretty sure this is a false positive, because I uploaded copies of the webpages to Jotti's and VirusTotal, and they came out clean with all the other scanners. Also, if I look at the reviews directly from http://www.hometheaterhifi.com , they are fine. It seems to be the combination of the Hometheaterhifi.com review embedded within the Ecoustics.com webpage that causes the problem.

    In accordance with forum policy, I have not posted a link to one of these reviews (though I will do so at a moderator's request). I have submitted a quarantined sample to Eset for review, with a link in the description. If anyone could look into this, that would be great.
     
  2. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,174
    Location:
    Denmark
    Because it has something to do with a support/analysis request, you may post a non-clickable link (hxxp://).
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2006
  3. alglove

    alglove Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Posts:
    904
    Location:
    Houston, Texas, USA
    Thanks, Brian! Here are a couple of non-clickable links. I have problems with the first link, but not the second. See if anyone else has the same problem...

    hxxp://www.ecoustics.com/secrets/volume_13_3/arcam-solo-8-2006.html
    hxxp://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_13_3/arcam-solo-8-2006.html
     
  4. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    Yeah NOD32 lights up like a Christmas tree :blink: ;) :D

    Will have to wait for Marcos to come along and analyse it.

    Cheers :D
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,174
    Location:
    Denmark
    And here's a virustotal scan of the file. As you can see, only NOD32 detects it.
    Guess we'll have to wait for Marcos :)

    And I also forgot you already did that, my bad :p
     

    Attached Files:

    • asd.JPG
      asd.JPG
      File size:
      91.2 KB
      Views:
      282
  6. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    mmm.... I've seen the fireworks too. :D It's an heuristic detection as I see (.gen) and I think it will be fixed soon.
     
  7. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    Don't be so sure , pykko !
    I have seen lots of examples (real and screenshots from VirusTotal) with real malware which only NOD32 (or NOD32 + few others) detect . This can be just one example .

    By the way , already submitted to ESET labs and Support ! :thumb:
     
  8. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    it has been fixed. NO warning here. :)

    EDIT: It seems not. ON the first page I still get the warning. :(
     
  9. ASpace

    ASpace Guest


    Buddy , as I said , they are already submitted and they will decide if it is real threat :D :D ;) Will inform you if I receive any reply :)
     
  10. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    It seems to be triggered because the first 19 characters are <html><head><title> and there is .com before the </title> tag.

    Looks like a probable FP IMHO since nothing else in the document causes detection but it is not my place here to say that it is or isn't actually safe.

    Cheers :)
     
  11. alglove

    alglove Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Posts:
    904
    Location:
    Houston, Texas, USA
    That's OK. I was just thinking, "Maybe I should have put up some screenshots," but then you did them all for me. Thanks! :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.