Is it possible? Probably the answer to this question is, yes. Thanks to this: @BoerenkoolMetWorst https://www.wilderssecurity.com/thr...d-edge-looks-like.414193/page-31#post-3025993 that stimulated my curiosity. And thanks to an intervention elsewhere by @dmiranda who provided me with the link below: https://v8.dev/blog/jitless Super Duper Secure Mode in Edge completely disables JIT Turbofan V8: https://microsoftedge.github.io/edgevr/posts/Super-Duper-Secure-Mode/ so you should correct the flag suggested by: @BoerenkoolMetWorst Code: --js-flags=--jitless with Code: --js-flags=--no-opt For verification you can run the SunSpider 1.0.2 test: https://webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html as suggested by MalwareBytes Labs. Given the highly experimental nature of the content of this thread, which obviously reflects the experimental nature of the Super Duper Secure Mode that you can enable in Edge we recommend caution * and maybe some feedback. Thank you all for your attention. * = In the MT forum some users report that enabling SDSM prevents some browser extensions from working properly. To check your V8 Javascript: chrome://version
HeiDef's anti-fp is quite good, actually really good. Free version offer kinda of better protection what iv tested similar sofwares. But again, its a browser extension. Need to check if its sendin somenting information rather than updating itself....pcapping
Why that? SDSM in Edge disables TurboFan and Sparkplug, no-opt only disables TurboFan. So I think --jitless is closer to Edge. With Brave I got 912ms compared to 427ms. EDIT: 912ms for --jitless 899ms for --no-opt 427ms for standard.
Yes,from the data you provided it is better to use "jitless". It would be interesting to know in detail if the vulnerabilities affect more Turbofan or Sparkplug because in this case there is an intermediate possibility to recover performance. Even if the recovery is very small.
