easeus todo updated to version 3.5

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by zfactor, Nov 2, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,012
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    Dear users,

    The release version of EaseUS Todo Backup 3.5 is available on October 31, 2011. In order to complete backup task/plan more efficiently, we have made some improvements in version 3.5.

    New added features

    Remote computer connection - connect to remote machine on the network to manage the backup.

    Improvements

    Email notification can be set to send to multiple addresses.

    The result of backup task/plan is added in the title of notification mail.

    Customer can modify the authentication information of network connection saved by EaseUS Todo Backup.

    Know more about this version, please visit the website:
    http://www.todo-backup.com/
    If you are already a registered user of a previous version, about the upgrade policy, please refer to:
    http://www.todo-backup.com/support/upgrade.htm

    EASEUS Tech Support team
    EASEUS Customer Support Center:
    http://www.easeus.com/support.htm
     
  2. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    3,519
    Location:
    USA - Back in a real State in time for a real Pres
    Love the free version. It has been my only imaging program for Windows since v2.
     
  3. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    Thanks. I'll test this out...haven't used it since v2.
     
  4. guest

    guest Guest

    I hope they add update mode for backing up.
     
  5. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    I hope it just restores without messing up my System Reserved partition.
     
  6. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    493
    Location:
    USA
    Any conclusion on this?
     
  7. aladdin

    aladdin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Posts:
    2,986
    Location:
    Oman
    I find it better to get rid of System Reserved partition and put the files under Drive C.

    Best regards,

    KOR!
     
  8. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    No, sorry...haven't had time to test it out. I will do my best!
     
  9. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    I'm really impressed at the progression of Todo Backup,especially the free version which is more comprehensive than quite a few paid applications.
     
  10. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    Yeah it looks like they added quite a bit to the free version, which is impressive!
     
  11. TheMozart

    TheMozart Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,486
    This would be a great product for me and work great IF it detected my USB hard drive when I boot the rescue USB stick/CD, but it fails to locate it and fails to detect it. :thumbd:

    Acronis Trueimage and ShadowProtect WORK and pick it up however.

    If EaseUS fixes their rescue medium then it would work great.

    Maybe the Windows Rescue CD would work and pick up and detect my USB hard drive, but unfortunately I am unable to download 1.7GB of data needed to create it :'(

    I assume the linux based rescue medium is the culprit. But they should work, because if I run Ubuntu Linux CD, Ubuntu detects all my hard drives.

    I suspect the Linux rescue medium written by EaseUS is off poor quality. Macrium is worse, it doesn't even pick up and detect my C: drive.
     
  12. andylau

    andylau Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Posts:
    679
    TheMozart,

    Your USB hard drive is USB 3.0?

    Basically, bootcd based on WinPE 3.0 will have better hardware support.
     
  13. TheMozart

    TheMozart Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,486
    No, I don't have USB 3.0. My HP laptop uses USB version 2.0

    And I cannot create a WinPE boot Rescue CD because I have a very slow internet connection and unable to download 1.7GB of data for the creation of the WinPE Boot CD.:thumbd:

    The Linux based EaseUS boot USB stick/CD should work, but it's too poorly written to detect my USB hard drive.
     
  14. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    Funny I've had the opposite experience with the Linux-based CD's...that they typically work better - or on par with - the WinPE equivalents.
     
  15. TheMozart

    TheMozart Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,486
    Linux drivers are a lot slower than windows drivers. 50mins restoring using a Linux driver based CD, compared with 20 minutes restoring the same image using Windows driver based CD.

    In addition, Windows based driver boot CD's detect my external USB hard drive, where Linux based driver boot CD's do not.

    Test it for yourself. Restore the same image using Linux boot CD verses WinPE boot CD and come back and tell me the time difference.
     
  16. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    I don't have to...I have, many times...Linux has almost been equal or faster.
     
  17. TheMozart

    TheMozart Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,486
    I do not believe you. :thumbd:

    Everyone knows, and many tests have been done, that windows driver based CD's restore images a lot faster than Linux driver based CD's. And that's why there is always so much emphasis from EaseUS and other companies to encourage people to buy their full product so they can get the WinPE ISO part of the package.
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2011
  18. napoleon1815

    napoleon1815 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Posts:
    702
    Not asking you to believe me. At this point we are pretty far off the thread topic. I'd be happy to discuss this with you in a separate dedicated thread.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.