Dr. Web updates

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Bunkhouse Buck, May 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,056
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I notice Dr. Web has not updated virus signatures for a few days. Last was 368569 on 4/30.
     
  2. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    Don't forget first of May is a major holiday in Russia.:D
     
  3. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,056
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    True, but malware does not observe holidays. I use Dr. Web (and others at times) and with the program's decent heuristics, users should be protected.
     
  4. PiCo

    PiCo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Posts:
    352
    Location:
    Athens, Greece
    It's a major holiday here in Greece too. Unfortunately that's the way it is, nothing works or moves that day :)
     
  5. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,057
    Location:
    North Carolina
    It should be with the release of the new Kaspersky Suite.;)

    Buck, Dr. Web has hueristics and also if something was needed I am sure they have staff that could push out a update.You are better protected with Dr Web and 3 day old sigs then some up to date ones.:cautious:
     
  6. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,056
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    The lack of updates was not meant as a criticism- just stating facts. :)
     
  7. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    yep that's what heuristics are for,

    Nobody should be on their computer anyway, its our bank holiday weekend too, I'm planning on getting ****ed off
    my face :)

    I'm sure there are skeleton staff still there if there is an outbreak of something :)

    Some avs have weekly updates, (if that) how do they manage?

    Yes it is a fact bunk, but no need to worry :)
     
  8. Edwin024

    Edwin024 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Posts:
    1,000
    Kaspersky is also in Russia, they came up with an update on May 1. I find it amazing in the current world that security companies, like av-industries, don't bring out updates during weekends or holidays. I saw it happen often with Eset, also with Avira and Symantec, and I fear that more companies can be added. It's dangerous, whatever heuristics programs may have. The buyers of the software rely on the programs. And please: understand that not all pc users are on Wilders. The mass is ignorent, they buy the proggie and assume they are safe.
     
  9. risl

    risl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    581
    Remember that they pushed over 1000 signatures update before the holidays.
     
  10. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,056
    Location:
    Las Vegas
  11. Teknokrat

    Teknokrat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Posts:
    95
    Location:
    First Life? (Sweden)
    Good point Edwin024.

    That ought to be a valid point regardless of what favorite AV you have.
     
  12. PiCo

    PiCo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Posts:
    352
    Location:
    Athens, Greece
    Perhaps they had gone in the football match between Zenit Saint Petersburg and Bayern Muenchen :D

    4-0 just for the record.
     
  13. risl

    risl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    581
  14. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    It's a pity to think that having new updates every two-three hours is definitely safer than a program which updates 3 times per day (for e.g.) . A vendor can release update once per week but it cathes all the nasties , it is enough . No matter that Kaspersky added Proactive modules and improved heuristics , they are still rely mostly on signature , whereas ESET rely more on heuristics. AVIRA scores good on heuristics , too . Different strategies to fight malware - they work differently and do work .

    If you complain DrWeb didn't release an update , can you stand up and say you got infected and lost data because of this ? No , you can't.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2008
  15. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,006
    to survive in the fight against malware you really need hourly signiture updates with decent heristics and some sort of HIPS module.
     
  16. ASpace

    ASpace Guest


    Can you prove it :rolleyes:
     
  17. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,006
    well i ment a combonation of all the things listed
    you need a decent amount of signiture updates along with decent heristics and HIPS module t
     
  18. solcroft

    solcroft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,639
    Wrong. Both Avira and the new Kaspersky beta have excellent heuristics; the only reason you rarely see those heuristics in action is because they are ALSO very swift in adding signatures. On the other hand, ESET relies on heuristics most of the time, because it's SLOW in adding signatures. You don't judge the effectiveness of a heuristics engine by the number of times it triggers.

    Yep, and some work better than others.
     
  19. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    A vendor can adjust heuristic rules so that 99.99 % of the malware is detected . But this is not done because it will also slow down the machine and will generate false positive . But YES , with 99.99 we will for sure survive the fight against malware and hackers.
    With 99.99% of the malware caught proactively , will we need new signature update every hour -> NO. Will we even need new signature update every week -> NO . Because hackers will need some more time to bypass these 99.99%.

    With 60 - 70% of malware caught proactively , no hourly updates are needed , I believe.

    Do you also think about the OS built-in security feautures ? If you think about that , we can for sure say that at least 10% (if not much more) cannot run without user insistent interaction.
     
  20. solcroft

    solcroft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,639
    Exactly. Which is why those products that rely exclusively on their "cutting-edge" heuristics are nothing but a farce. Good protection consists of multiple technologies, such as swift signature updates and behavior blockers, working in tandem.
     
  21. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,746
    Location:
    Texas
    According to this post, updates are back. Thread closed.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.