Do the 'add on bits' nmake a difference?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Davidpr, Jun 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Davidpr

    Davidpr Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Posts:
    92
    I have been looking at the various posts for all the types of AV discussed in this forum.

    For some a basic AV is what they want and it suits them well - e.g. F Prot and perhaps Anti Vir. Other AV's are now coming with rootkit scanners (including Anti Vir), antispyware modules, HIPS modules, some type of sandboxing modules, HTTP scanners, e mail scanners etc.

    So my question is; are these add on's really required, do they make a huge difference in protecting your machine, are they are marketing ploy? Is this a phase to era where AV's will not really be AV's but a single product providing muliple layers of protection?

    Best wishes.
     
  2. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,897
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    In my opinion, these "addons" can be very useful tools in the constant fight against malware. As you can see in the screen shot the suite I run has a few.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. tamdam

    tamdam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Posts:
    88
    some add-ons like email scanners and http scanners are useless marketing fluff, which provide no real benefit over the traditional on-access file scanner, although there are some exceptions where they might cover some weaknesses. But there are some features that are definitely good to have, like firewalls, HIPS-like behaviour blockers, and exploit blockers.

    Having said that, there's no suite out there that can match layered defense in terms of theoretical malware: however some of the better suites are definitely adequate enough to handle the "real world" malware.
     
  4. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    email and HTTP scanners are no marketing BS or fluff (or whatever you want to call them).
     
  5. TonyW

    TonyW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,727
    Location:
    UK
    Bigc, what AV does Blink use?
     
  6. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    I think Norman
     
  7. midway40

    midway40 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Posts:
    1,257
    Location:
    SW MS, USA
    Email scanners may be redundant now since most ISP's provide their own internal AV scanning. For example my ISP uses McAfee AV and Postini antispam. I have yet to receive a virus via email and what little Postini misses Windows Mail antispam catches it.

    HTTP scanners are important though.
     
  8. besafe

    besafe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Posts:
    222
    I think the add ons can make a big difference in the amount of protection offered. However, I think in general you are better off piecing together different programs rather than using an all in one.
     
  9. Hipgnosis

    Hipgnosis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Posts:
    297
    Location:
    Witness Protection Program
    Yes, it uses Norman AV
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.