Congratulation Webroot!

Discussion in 'Prevx Releases' started by claudiu, Oct 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. claudiu

    claudiu Guest

    Congratulation Webroot for being "Tested" in the latest AV Comparatives, Oct2012!

    Good job!

    Claudiu
     
  2. Techfox1976

    Techfox1976 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Posts:
    749
    Yet people who are more intelligent and educated on security than you still use it for good reasons despite the test being incapable of simulating reality.

    Does that frustrate you?
     
  3. claudiu

    claudiu Guest

  4. Techfox1976

    Techfox1976 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Posts:
    749
    So the smart people answer confidently and incorrectly, and when corrected, they can see where they made their mistake. While the stupid people can't figure out the answer at all, ask questions, and when explained to them, they still can't figure it out and ask the same questions again.

    Sounds about right.

    So again, does it frustrate you?
     
  5. claudiu

    claudiu Guest

    "So again, does it frustrate you?"

    To be honest, yes!

    As a stupid I bought 5 licenses for WSA, good for 5 years;that confirms "Smart People Are Stupid"
     
  6. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Have you had any problems with WSA letting threats through?
     
  7. hogndog

    hogndog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Posts:
    628
    Location:
    In His Service
    Are any of those machines infected?
     
  8. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    4,948
    Location:
    USA
    Webroot didn't get no where close to the results I would have liked to have seen, but at least they are being tested now. They have taken a step in the right direction. Does AV comparatives just scan the samples or do they actually try executing them also to see if the samples are detected by heuristics? WSA has never been great about detecting malware by just scanning samples without them being executed. Regardless, i'm not trying to make any excuse for their poor test results because I would prefer malware be detected without it actually being executed. Sometimes it's just too late after malware has been executed to stop it even if it is detected by heuristics upon execution. Its much safer to detect it before execution, and block access to the file before execution.
     
  9. Ibrad

    Ibrad Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Posts:
    1,949
    The latest test was an on-demand scan afaik the real world tests do execute the samples I believe.
     
  10. kdcdq

    kdcdq Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Posts:
    657
    Location:
    Southwestern Massachusetts
    I am running WSA on all five of my systems, and I have installed WSA on two dozen or so client systems in the last few months. Not one of these systems have ever been infected with any detectable malware. :thumb:

    The same cannot be said for the dozens of systems running other security software that I have disinfected this year. The last time I mentioned the names of the "other" security software vendors it resulted in the usual weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth :)P ), so I ain't doing that again. :argh:
     
  11. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,727
    Location:
    Texas
    Off topic post removed. Focus on the software.
     
  12. m0unds

    m0unds Guest

    i couldn't care less whether or not an on-demand scan of a folder full of malware yields poor results. the WSA product has proven itself in other, more relevant third party tests.

    i've deployed WSA on a number of customers' machines, many of whom are habitually bad at using the internet, and somehow, their machines have remained clean. go figure that it does well when used as intended, rather than being used to scan a testing organization's malware collection :rolleyes:

    these "the sky is falling" posts after every test release make my head hurt.
     
  13. The Seeker

    The Seeker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,100
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Logic has no place here!
     
  14. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,057
    Location:
    North Carolina
    IBK stated the malware was executed.
     
  15. PC_Fiddler

    PC_Fiddler Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Posts:
    167
    Location:
    Yorkshire - UK
    I actually got a PM from the member who started this post a couple of hours ago pointing to the fact I seem to be following 'Joe' & 'TH' blindly along with an enclosed link - You have made your point Claudiu & you are entitled to it but when you resort to sending private messages to people (me) to further your cause & to start a post regarding an subject that already has a running thread using plain sarcasm you are without any doubt a troll, & a troll who has problems...

    Edit:
    'A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject'
    - Sir Winston S Churchill
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2012
  16. fax

    fax Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Posts:
    3,724
    Location:
    localhost
    In the so called "dynamic" test, not this one :)
     
  17. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    784
    Oh no , this guy again o_O
     
  18. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    4,948
    Location:
    USA
    They didn't execute the malware in this particular test. They do in some of their other test.
     
  19. BonskY

    BonskY Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Posts:
    69
    Location:
    Longueuil, Canada
    Hum, that explain in part why Webroot doesn't get the real score,

    If I well remember from the PC mag review, in order to save up computer resource, WSA eat the malware when it executed and not on access...

    Correct me if a make a error
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.