Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by wasgij6, Nov 4, 2015.
Thanks. Been waiting to try this one.
from their forums:
good old Melih, never let a rushed release go to waste
Turned my W10 machine into mud
I also experienced the terrible slow and delays when launching applications. I already uninstalled the beta. Hopefully the fix this terrible bug ASAP. I really want to like this product it has everything i want in an AV product.
Good concept but ...
Think i'll await After '200 bugs fixed' at least
Where's CIS9 beta at
That was the 'leaked pre-alpha' of CIS9
2 months later and no word on a 'proper version'.
Anyhow let's keep on topic and hear thoughts on CCAV.
Does it have a new GUI, or is it the same as CIS?
Its the same interface as CIS 9 beta.
it's a completely different concept less complicated for users.
Why not incorporate this into the security suite.
I quite like the cloud AV. It has all I need without unnecessary ballast from CIS. They just have tof ix few things:
- the mega slowdowns (alrady confirmed and scheduled to be fixed this week)
- on-access detection (on creation/on copy) and not just on-execution
- registering with Windows Security Center
Other than that, it was fine.
main Products 1) Comodo Internet Security 9 (firewall pro)
2) Comodo Cloud AV + sandbox
3) separate sandbox Comodo (december 2015 Scheduled beta)
I believe the cloud AV will, in future, the Comodo Internet Security.
There are important implementation valkyrie into the product. https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/comodo-valkyrie-revamp.379662/
Hotfix for performance issues released!
How are you finding it
Stable yet ?
Very stable here on my W10 x64 machine. All prior slowdowns are gone............. So far, so good.
I do not get it, what is the difference between this and their usualy Av because as far as i know that to uses the cloud. Someone care to enlighten me ?
it is pure cloud av without offline signatures+it have autosandbox but nothing more. so u will have no bloat like the CIS. the cloud is diverent too. it will use Valkyre and more for the cloud part when its in final. so the detection rate would be much different from the CIS as it is now.
Ok, that hopefully means that it will be much better than it is now in detection, looking forward to it.
Man, I hope the leave it as on-execution only. The whole reason to have this simple, "basic", light AV is to be just that. There are plenty of AVs out there that scan on creation/copy.
It's not really all that much lighter and it sucks for files in transit through my system because I have to manually scan them, otherwise I'm not sure they are fine.
> I agree with post # 20, need help in understanding?
> So basic from the above posts, it just a secondary scanner?
> What is opinion of the sandbox?
> No firewall and/or would you be better with just their Comodo Firewall?
Separate names with a comma.