Just arrived a few moments ago: https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2018/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_24.html @mood You can re-post the links if you like...
Google Chrome 64.0.3282.119 Stable Offline Installers Consumer version Code: x64 https://redirector.gvt1.com/edgedl/release2/chrome/AI0X_D2-JI40_64.0.3282.119/64.0.3282.119_chrome_installer.exe x86 https://redirector.gvt1.com/edgedl/release2/chrome/AO49t9w1gKdl_64.0.3282.119/64.0.3282.119_chrome_installer.exe Enterprise version (msi installers) Code: x64 https://dl.google.com/dl/chrome/install/googlechromestandaloneenterprise64.msi x86 https://dl.google.com/dl/chrome/install/googlechromestandaloneenterprise.msi Linux Code: x64 https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb x86 https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm Mac Code: https://dl.google.com/chrome/mac/stable/GGRO/googlechrome.dmg Chrome Cleanup Tool Code: https://dl.google.com/dl/softwareremovaltool/free-range/win/chrome_cleanup_tool.exe
This is the "Tab Isolation". After a new tab is opened and the user is surfing to a website a new process is launched (Chrome, Firefox, IE, ... are doing it) In Firefox it is limited to "a few processes" by default (default: 4, but the user can change it "Content Process Limit"), and even after opening 100 tabs you wouldn't see 100 processes, but much less (the maximum will be the amount of processes selected in the settings). Open 100 tabs in Chrome and your RAM will be filled very fast "Site Isolation" is adding a second line of defense. Enabling it also mitigates "the web browser security bug, called universal cross-site scripting (UXSS)" (Chrome 63 and newer) And it also helps to mitigate speculative side-channel attack techniques. The first thing you'll notice is that if a site embedds a youtube-video via iframe, an additional process is launched for the youtube-video even if it is displayed on the same tab. In this case: 1 Tab = 2 Processes #24 ("Securing Browsers Through Isolation Versus Mitigation") The thread might give you some more insights but especially this: Site Isolation Design Document
Here is an important Site Isolation update regarding changes from Chrome 63 to 64. Site Isolation Status - Availability, field trials, improved support in Chrome 64 Link: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/chromium-dev/0zJIwDOMSNo/xXnfrXgQAwAJ
Yes, but also beneficial in many others ways as well. I would highly recommend it as long as it does not cause any specific issues with your setup.
Thanks. One of the in-progress items listed for site isolation is “Adding support for printing pages with cross-site iframes.” Do you know what that means? I’m concerned that I might be doing something important that has a confirmation page and I wouldn’t be able to print it. How likely is that?
I've had it enabled for several weeks on 64 bit beta on a low end HP laptop with no noticeable issues whatsoever.
FYI. Google Chrome Portable 64.0.3282.119 Stable (web browser) Released for the PA Platform, courtesy of PortableApps.com.
I recommend checking this out. I enabled it for desktop and it works as well. http://www.androidpolice.com/2018/0...s-switches-white-navigation-bar-apk-download/
I've already got that enabled in Chrome. Maybe it was mentioned in this thread for some other reason?