BufferZonePro

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by jmonge, Nov 23, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    is bufferzonepro alive?is development active or dead?is anyone using it?thanks alot:thumb:
     
  2. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    It was last updated on 30 October 2012 so i'd say yes, they are still active.
     
  3. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    thanks
     
  4. pintas

    pintas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Posts:
    171
    And now its free i suppose.
    Not my kind of security software, but it is pretty nice.
     
  5. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    it is a sandbox:thumb: and virtualizer too;)
     
  6. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    BufferZone Pro is active, but it is Not very popular here.
    Sandboxie and DefenseWall lead the way...;)
     
  7. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
    development little slow..:doubt:
     
  8. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    but still workso_O :D
     
  9. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    5,965
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    I had problems with it. Just too many bugs for my taste.:D
     
  10. kjdemuth

    kjdemuth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    2,960
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ditto. Slow to open browser. GUI issue with firefox. Occasional BSOD when opening chrome. If they could iron out some of the bugs then it would be a great alternative.
     
  11. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    very true:)
     
  12. KelvinW4

    KelvinW4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Posts:
    1,199
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    Everything here is true:blink:
     
  13. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    It is possible to use BufferZonePro as a "new executable" sandbox only, the way CIS sandbox works.

    Steps
    1. Remove all programs from the protected programs list (see picture below).
    So now Bufferzone won't virtualise programs when they are started. Advantage is that the formerly protected programs will start much faster. By default all programs are trusted now. See picture below. Click edit BufferZone Programs, select a program and press red X to remove

    2. Activate Application control for newly discovered programs
    See link https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1792527&postcount=36

    3. Activate Script/macro control for new scripts/macros
    See link https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1792528&postcount=37

    4, Choose the level of security you want
    See link https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1792526&postcount=35
    In this example signed programs from external devices (e.g. USB) and newly signed programs are allowed to run outside the sandbox. By simply moving the slider, the security level is changed (and explained in text).
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.png
      1.png
      File size:
      58.6 KB
      Views:
      437
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2012
  14. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    BufferZone also has a safe browsing (for e-banking) option, just tell BufferZone Pro which browser you use and make sure you add your browser in the firewall. see pricture. In e-banking it protects the browser from the rest of the system (reversed sandbox functionality). Press + to add a program/firewall rule and red X to remove it.

    Stupid and maybe strange way of using two secondary functionalities of BufferZone with the primary function. Runs a lot faster and adds some protection (also on x64).
     

    Attached Files:

    • 2.png
      2.png
      File size:
      80.9 KB
      Views:
      434
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2012
  15. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    BufferZone Pro

    BUGgy indeed...;)
     
  16. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,433
    Location:
    Europe
  17. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    GeSWall vs BufferzonePro

    Contained applications : 1 GW, on some distance BZ
    use Comodo FireWall Test suite to check it

    System Wide virtualisation: 1 BZ, 2 GW
    GW uses Windows Internals, so when you copy an untrusted program to say another partition, it loses its protection, no protection on USB (Defense Wall has total file isolation and does not have the disadvantage of GW).

    Note: you can use the slider of BZ to increase level of protection and when you add application control, it also protects against all new executables. Personally I think this is the smartest form of system wide protection (because it monitors all executables).

    Safe browsing: don't know
    Difficult to tell, in MRG test it they did not use BZ's special e-banking option. , BZ scored same as SBIE, GW not tested.

    X32 vs x64
    BZ works on both

    On X64 I would use BZ in the setup explained above and opt for IEx64 with protected mode or Chromex32 with its internal sandbox when wanting a free solution, use SBIE when willing to pay. On x32 I would opt for GW free (with geswall.dat of the Pro version for full coverage) when wanting a free solution, use DW when willing to pay.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2012
  18. emmjay

    emmjay Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Posts:
    882
    Location:
    Triassic
    The e-banking option is only for Internet Explorer. (v4.04.185).
    Update FF and Chrome add-ons outside BZ or they will only apply to the current browsing session. Cleaning the session (emptying BZ) does not take place when you close your browser if you have it set to 1 day (like cleaning after each session in SBIE). BZ will sometimes start cleaning while you have an active session which means BZ will auto close your open session. This can be annoying.
     
  19. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,433
    Location:
    Europe
    Thanks Kees :thumb:
     
  20. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,433
    Location:
    Europe
    I tried to install BufferZone, but it told me that it's not compatible with Comodo :( ( CIS sandbox is disabled in my system ): someone uses CIS and BufferZone ? Do they work together ? There are any conflicts or issues ?
     
  21. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,433
    Location:
    Europe
    I tried the installation: BZ and CIS - in my system - are incompatible: reboots, freezes, and many services disabled by BZ after the installation. :(
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.