Hello, I have trusted AVZ as a secondary antivirus until this(see attached): Is this a false positive, because I know Kapersky uses this in their software as well. Here is the VirusTotal results: ~Virus Total results removed per Policy. Additional information File size: 5125238 bytes MD5...: afbae9d021c74ac8e8e376e342a9b0c1 SHA1..: 38efa387b66bf175d08791499ac90ba0ccc966bd SHA256: dd2be735e3006dc8d85647c097dd9993858cb3de5bbeeed4b36d3ba649896ee0 ssdeep: 98304:/pRH6XfJ18l6ToB3lpbatap75gX+wxKfK1M3ow98oOrve:36XfJ1QooB3l<br>pmcp75gX+wxdG3naoKG<br> PEiD..: - PEInfo: - RDS...: NSRL Reference Data Set<br>- pdfid.: - trid..: ZIP compressed archive (100.0%) packers (Kaspersky): PE_Patch.UPX, UPX sigcheck:<br>publisher....: n/a<br>copyright....: n/a<br>product......: n/a<br>description..: n/a<br>original name: n/a<br>internal name: n/a<br>file version.: n/a<br>comments.....: n/a<br>signers......: -<br>signing date.: -<br>verified.....: Unsigned<br> packers (F-Prot): UPX
So let me get this straight: some other security software detects something in AVZ file? Correct? In that scenario, I'd report that as false positive to your main AV's vendor. Security software detecting each other's components is all way too common That's just because how the work and what they contain (malware sigs for example).
The fault of the av and not AVZ - FP. edit : doing a hash search on virustotal pulls up avz4.zip - 2/41
People should really have more faith both in themselves and in their security software, and have the courage to report events like these right away to their AV vendor I can understand hesitancy based on language barriers for example