... Ha-ha. AV-Test falls into their own trap. They say they see new malware every two second - then why do they select them and check against only against 100, when they see millions ? When they are so much on the ball, when they are so new - why they test and use old technologies such as Windows XP (code started to be written in 1999) and Windows 7 (released 2009) ? It doesn't matter Windows XP/7 are most used - security comes from the OS and apps - they are old and not secure enough. Why don't they test Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012 ? Why they don't test all Microsoft technologies such as Smart Screen Filter? And the most important - they get millions of new samples but notice - they select samples they think are "recent" and important. With 100 out of 1 million - this is pretty much zero. This is biased - this is total untrue. How come they select?! This means that they decide which product will detect what and how much ! And they get only 0.0..% of what is seen new (according to them). These words of theirs totally put them low as they must be!