AV-Test.org Review and Certification Report Q4 (2010)

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by 3GUSER, Jan 24, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 3GUSER

    3GUSER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Posts:
    812
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
  2. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    Nice!
    Waiting for results!!! :rolleyes:
     
  3. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    thx for the update
    looking forward to results
     
  4. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    should be interesting.
     
  5. Kernelwars

    Kernelwars Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Posts:
    2,155
    Location:
    TX
    Thanks for the update:thumb:
     
  6. malexous

    malexous Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Posts:
    828
    Location:
    Ireland
    http://twitter.com/avtestorg
     
  7. 3GUSER

    3GUSER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Posts:
    812
    Thanks for the update!

    As usual there are some products that fail.
     
  8. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,819
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
  9. ExtremeGamerBR

    ExtremeGamerBR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    1,115
  10. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    Nice!
    Good work for top performers :D
     
  11. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    congrats to norton , kaspersky , f-secure, panda

    good work ...


    just 1 confusion

    how could F-secure score 92 in slowdown ?? :0 .. its supposed to be heavy compared to others


    Also looking at score , i guess kaspersky is real winner in this
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
  12. Matthijs5nl

    Matthijs5nl Guest

    It is way lighter than Kaspersky and Panda in my eyes :), it is only quite slow at boot time but on normal usage it is really quite light.
     
  13. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    ok, ya i installed it and it slowed my boot , so i uninstaller it

    1 more imp thing is kaspersky has scored very good in removal on post execution which is impressive as there is no security product close to its score


    another confusion ... MSE scoring high on slowdown ... i have not installed it ever but i always heard that it was light

    i wish they gave out details of test
     
  14. Matthijs5nl

    Matthijs5nl Guest

    I tried MSE several times, and it just ain't light. In contrary, I think most people experience it as light since it looks really simple.
     
  15. lordraiden

    lordraiden Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Posts:
    3,078
    Comodo, Dynamic test, Malware Blocking=100 % I guess that here is where the full suites are tested.

    Protection against 0 day malware... here only counts the detections of the AV?


    Bullguard better than norton in protection? I think the score system is a bit weird.
     
  16. King Grub

    King Grub Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Posts:
    814
  17. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,363
    Location:
    Sweden
    It's too bad they're comparing AVs to complete suites. It's hard to make out a proper 'winner' of the test as there are several contenders that could be better than the other. Obviously, features x + y + z combined is going to protect you more than only feature x.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
  18. Kernelwars

    Kernelwars Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Posts:
    2,155
    Location:
    TX
    AVG and webroot internet security have done really good...I am just a little shocked tho in a good way:D
     
  19. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,010
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Some more official testing of Vipre; good results.

    And the MSE version tested was not the latest, which IME, is lighter and the engine has been overhauled to give better protection.
     
  20. Vinicius Alexandre

    Vinicius Alexandre Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Posts:
    6
    This test is certainly a champion of surprises. The biggest in my opinion is almost perfect performance in the category of BullGuard detection. Another pleasant surprise was the 360 ° that Trend Micro seems to have succeeded in giving with your antivirus, although the performance is not perfect, surely it is much better than it used to be. And yet it is worth mentioning the great performance in testing for Kaspersky removal and protection against malware recently. It was expected a good performance from him, but the results do not cease to be amazing.
     
  21. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,559
    It is a very common misperception. It is not light.
     
  22. Pain of Salvation

    Pain of Salvation Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    398
    F-Secure low in system impact...
     
  23. smage

    smage Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Posts:
    377
    For those who understand this report, can you let me know why Comodo was not certified?

    Good job by KIS.

    Thanks
     
  24. lordraiden

    lordraiden Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Posts:
    3,078
    Anybody can answer this, the diference btw the Dynamic malware blocking test an the Protection against 0-day malware?
     
  25. gery

    gery Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Posts:
    1,786
    AVG is fine
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.