AV-comparatives proactive test predictions

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by risl, Nov 13, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. risl

    risl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    581
    There is a test listed for november 2007, so why don't we start speculating on this. Personally, I'm waiting to see if Dr.Web 4.44 origin detections or rootkit detections have any effect. F-prot would be also intresting with the Eldorado thing. Also Kaspersky had new heuristics if I remember correctly.

    So, what are your opinions? ;)


    (delete/lock if there is already a similar topic, didn't find it)
     
  2. Avena

    Avena Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Posts:
    1
    Hi,
    Yeah, I think you can do it.I too planned to start speculating on this.:eek:
     
  3. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    no, the programs are from august.
     
  4. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    i expect drweb to score quite well,

    however...

    i fear for the FP rate,

    i.e. Standard, but if FP's are lowered, Advanced.
     
  5. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    Well , 17 days before the results are going to released , don't you think it is a little bit early for such thread ?
     
  6. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590

    Not only early, but of debateable value. It's to easy to become A vs B and then closed. We shall see for a bit.
     
  7. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,306
    Surely this group of open minded, unbiased, and highly intelligent folks would not do that, would theyo_O?? :D Or would they?

    Regards,
    Jerry
     
  8. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Asked and answered.:D
     
  9. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Avira, fast scan, many FPs. The surprise may be Norton.;)
     
  10. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,306
    I doubt that there will be much of a change in positions from the former tests.
    Jerry
     
  11. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Yeah, me too. I expect very few surprises this time around. :)
     
  12. Diver

    Diver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Posts:
    1,444
    Location:
    Deep Underwater
    Go sit under a tree and don't think about it for 17 days.
     
  13. dawgg

    dawgg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Posts:
    818
    That's allready been tested...
    v6 (old heuristics)...9%
    v7 (new heuristics)...35%
    They were very new heuristics, don't know if there have been any major updates though... the heuristics on Kaspersky's beta servers have been updated... doubt these will be tested exclusively.

    Guess we can only wait and see till after the results are published... then we can actually comment upon the results... speculation isnt going to get us anywhere... need the true facts (and statistics) :)
     
  14. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    all think all results will differ from the last test.

    i think there will be quite a few changes compared to last test.
     
  15. TonyW

    TonyW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,741
    Location:
    UK
    Personally, I avoid making predictions, instead preferring to see Andreas' results when they do come out.
     
  16. kdcdq

    kdcdq Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Posts:
    815
    Location:
    A Non-Sh*thole State
    The only prediction that I can make with confidence is that the newly-rated best AV products will be the only ones that I am not using right now....:rolleyes:
     
  17. 212eta

    212eta Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Posts:
    67
    I am anxious about Symantec, ESET, and BitDefender! o_O
    Let's wait & see...:shifty:


    Uuuups!!! It will be another "famous" retrospective test...
    Meaning, a repetitive test on old stuff like nod32 v2.7, BitDefender 10 etc.

    Better check at chip.de, virusinfo.de, pcwelt.de etc.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2007
  18. apm

    apm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Posts:
    164
  19. Diver

    Diver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Posts:
    1,444
    Location:
    Deep Underwater
    I predict the winner will be elected President of the US.
     
  20. Arup

    Arup Guest


    In that case I nominate Dr. Web;)
     
  21. dawgg

    dawgg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Posts:
    818
  22. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    I predict Kaspersky, Symantec and DrWeb to do very well here.
     
  23. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    if you disregard signature detections for these results, drweb should do quite well but seeing as it still includes both, I ain't too sure.

    I still think advanced, unless it gets many fp's :)
     
  24. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    there will no big surprises I would say :doubt: . I expected other results (I thought they will all score much higher and also some single products are guessed would score much better than others, but I was wrong).
    what is maybe interesting is that many products have more FP's by signature.
    just wait 11 days.
     
  25. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    Doesnt sound good for the doctor that Ibk but well see :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.