AV-Comparatives - Heuristic/Behaviour Test March 2013

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by SweX, Aug 21, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Nov 1, 2007
    Kaspersky doing great, however Eset is disappointing.

    Avira is getting what is deserves (?), let's not even mention VIPRE !

    I didn't see what OS it was tested on ? Win 7, Win XP ?
  2. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Jan 10, 2011
    What's the test methodology? Is it just an on-demand scan of malware, or are they allowed to execute? I ask because I'd think Avast!s auto-sandbox would have detected a bunch of the threats.
  3. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Apr 21, 2007
    It's all in the report.....

    It is also mentioned in the report that this test is only done once a year because it is time consuming......
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2013
  4. Dark Lord

    Dark Lord Registered Member

    Jun 30, 2011
    I 100% agree with this statement.. Its unfair to punish twice for false positives :(
    If i remember correctly "Pbust" when he used to be working on Panda, also raised this question why punishing AV's twice for on-demand test and behavioral test o_O
    I too suggest not to consider false positives for this behavioral test and punish AV's twice which is useless :doubt:
    Totally agree with "Fabian Wosar"'s point :thumb:

    IBK please shed some light for this issue... :)

    Dark Lord
  5. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Nov 6, 2009
    I cant believe i missed this post for 2 days. Anywas, congrats to the top scorers . . . as always Emsisoft, Bitdefender and Kaspersky.

    Keep up the good work Emsi. :D
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.