Real-World Protection Test Chart https://www.av-comparatives.org/com...chart_month=Mar-Jun&chart_sort=1&chart_zoom=3 Malware Protection Test (March) Chart https://www.av-comparatives.org/com...=2022&chart_month=4&chart_sort=1&chart_zoom=3 Performance Test Chart https://www.av-comparatives.org/com...=2022&chart_month=7&chart_sort=1&chart_zoom=0
OK so most performed pretty good, but Malwarebytes (13 misses) and Cybereason (a whopping 54 misses) stood out. Actually, CrowdStrike (6 misses) and Sophos and Cisco (both 8 misses) also should be doing better. Keep in mind, I'm assuming that with "compromised'' they mean that an AV failed to block malware from running, instead of failing to identify a malicious URL from running. Because that would be quite silly.
