Analysis: How Much System Memory Is Really Enough?

hehe - oops!

from the article -

Bolding mine - but I wanna see some of these 2MB max memory systems!

Otherwise very interesting article.

 

Ahem - you're dating yourself here!

 

I remember that very well. I had an AST computer that I bumped from 4-8 megs (around 1996) and that memory upgrade cost around $200!! About that same time I also remember being happier than a lark with my 387MB hard drive.

 

Upgrading from a 64 meg computer to a new 256 MB was a dream come true... 5 years ago that is.

I can't imagine what it would feel like running on a 2GB.

 

My first computer was a Commodore 64. I didn't even own the cassette drive, so I had to type in any programs each time I wanted to run one. Now I'm talking 1986 and we're talking 64 kilobytes of memory!

 

Interesting read

 

I hafta admit my first was an 8 MB... After that I had a 64, added another 128 to it. From there I went straight to a gig in the custom rig. Now that was just a shock.

 

The one thing I like about having 2gb's of memory is not worrying if it is enough. I'll never go back

 

the thing is right now i feel you dont really need more than 1gb of ram. 2gb is like partly over kill

 

For XP systems, I think you're basically right.

I noticed the performance bump going from 512 to 768 MB, but it seemed much smaller going to 1 GB, and a second machine I have with 2.5 GB isn't much faster for the bulk of my work. For real intensive operations I can see the difference, but not in 95% of my current usage.

Of course, I also still remember the days when 16-64k was the norm and I was usually on the low end of things back then. At some point I'm sure I'll be wondering how I ever got by with less than 1 TB of RAM and my Gbps connection....

Blue

 

We had a 64k processing unit for the Atari computers back when. I also remember it being a big deal that you needed a whole 4MB of RAM to play DOOM

Now I have a tendancy to fill 1GB of RAM, but 2GB has been perfect. I never fill it, but that's the point. It's just done me better than 1GB or 1.5GB.

 

That's how I feel about it Notok. It's right for me and what I do. I tend to do a lot of multitasking, have several programs up at once, and that's when 2GB shines.

 

I'd like to see some realistic benchmarks when multitasking, swapping between applications, loading a new application up with a few running already, copying files etc, that will test how much use physical ram.
Also its not just about application memory, but disc cache as well, my server has 3 hdds (its my music share, developement webserver and has emule running 24/7) and I find that it does swallow up a lot of ram caching.

 

I think that really depends on how you use your pc. If you are a video editor or using your pc for some heavily graphical works or something like that then 2Gig and up could be ok. But if one is just using his pc for surfing the net and some ordinary works then I think 512MB to 1Gig could be just enough for him. It could be just be a waste of money spending bigger size memory then the system is not using it.

 

Hello,
On the most powerful comp, I got 2Gb ram, plus a nice processor, serves me quite well when I run 5-10 heavy applications one alongside the other. The issue of how much ram is never an issue for me. I think that 512Mb is too little. At least 1Gb or more.
Mrk

 

I have an AMD Athlon 4400+ 64Bit Dual Core (multi-tasking) and RAM = 2048 GB.

1. All my applications open in 1 or 2 or 3 seconds, even Firefox (3 seconds).
2. If a scanner starts running, I don't even feel it, while I'm working.

This is a Ferrari compared with my old computer.

 

Hmmm the answer is that the answer tends towards infinity.

I started with 1KB of RAM in my first computer. I can remember an older friend telling me that computers will never need more than 16kb of RAM, any more than that is just encouraging bloat and sloppy programing

My first IBM Clone PC had 128KB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compaq_Portable I'm about to upgrade from 1Gb to a 2Gb machine (later this year) and am considering 4Gb as I hate it when you start hitting the memory/disk thrashing wall.

Fairy

 

i think 1gb is more than sufficient for teh majority of people, with 2gb being needed for video editing and heavy video gaming.

if u want 4gb, id wait til more 64-bit drivers and program is released. 32-bit windows doesnt fully recognize 4gb.

 

Everyday use for Windows XP - 512mb
Power programs and gaming - AMD CPU - 2Gb (onboard memory controller gets slower with over 2Gb)
Power programs and gaming - Intel CPU - 2-4Gb (memory controller on motherboard)

After Vista Most reviewers say LOTS of memory and more.

SourMilk out

 

WSFuser,

I thought WindowsXP programs expect 4GB of memory virtual or real.
What do you mean it doesn't fully recognize 4GB?
If you put 4GB of RAM into a WinXP computer, it won't show 4GB?