Amazon's Kindle Fire = Spyware

Discussion in 'privacy general' started by CloneRanger, Sep 30, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,918
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/privacy...you-online-worse-than-google-or-facebook.html
     
  2. Dermot7

    Dermot7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Posts:
    3,317
    Location:
    Surrey, England.
  3. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    This is a problem with mobile devices. They can be handy, even essential for some, but they're far more difficult to secure and prevent unnecessary tracking.
     
  4. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,726
    So that's the reason for the low price. They make money out of your information. Good thing I have the old one, which isn't using that browser, at least for now.
     
  5. LockBox

    LockBox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    2,295
    Location:
    Here, There and Everywhere
    Important to note, in the last paragraph of the article:

    "Users who are seriously worried about the power of Amazon's cloud to track, watch and deliver advertising can simply turn the split-browser function off - although the company warns that this will slow things down."

    To write a big deal like that and only mention that you can turn this off in the last paragraph is terrible journalism.

    Another story on this from MSNBC:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44723096/ns/technology_and_science-security

    "Fortunately, Wisniewski notes, Amazon will enable Fire tablet owners to use Silk without routing traffic through the cloud. Connection speeds will be slower, but Wisniewski said it's a sacrifice well worth making."
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2011
  6. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,726
    I've seen enough terrible journalism already :thumbd:. Thanks for clearing that up.
     
  7. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  8. LockBox

    LockBox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    2,295
    Location:
    Here, There and Everywhere
    And the big issue is whether the Silk browser on the Kindle Fire should be routed through Amazon's servers by default - or the reverse. The old Opt-In/Opt-Out argument.

    Personally, I think the U.S. government has better things to worry about.
     
  9. Dermot7

    Dermot7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Posts:
    3,317
    Location:
    Surrey, England.
  10. Dermot7

    Dermot7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Posts:
    3,317
    Location:
    Surrey, England.
    "Amazon to Congress: No, Silk won't invade people's privacy" : http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...congress-silk-wont-invade-peoples-privacy.ars

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.