Adblock Edge

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Pinga, Oct 1, 2012.

  1. Pinga

    Pinga Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Posts:
    1,420
    Location:
    Europe
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/
     
  2. datarishik

    datarishik Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Posts:
    182
    Thanks a lot for the heads-up!
     
  3. Mman79

    Mman79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    2,016
    Location:
    North America
    Wasn't there a fork already done when this acceptable ad business first came about? It must have withered away when people finally got it through their head that you can turn that function off. I did when I first used AdBlock, and I've never enabled it again and it has never forced me to do so.
     
  4. Iskal8198

    Iskal8198 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3
    I second this.
     
  5. chrisretusn

    chrisretusn Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Posts:
    1,322
    Location:
    Philippines
    Since I can easily turn this feature off in Adblock Plus, I do not see any compelling reason to switch.
     
  6. siljaline

    siljaline Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,619
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2012
  7. tlu

    tlu Guest

    Neither do I. This new extension is solely based on the paranoia of many users who are unwilling/unable to read.
     
  8. funkydude

    funkydude Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Posts:
    6,855
    Hilarious really. It will be dead soon enough, if it even gains any traction.
     
  9. berryracer

    berryracer Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Posts:
    1,640
    Location:
    Dubai, UAE
    Ditto! The first thing I do when I install Ad-Block Plus FTW is to uncheck the box which says "allow some bla bla bla advertising"

    Takes a sec to do so
     
  10. siljaline

    siljaline Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,619
  11. Pinga

    Pinga Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Posts:
    1,420
    Location:
    Europe
    'Hilarious' is Wladimir Palant's strange idea that he is to decide what constitutes 'advertising that is considered not annoying':
    It's as if a car manufacturer would introduce an eco-friendly car with an extra-polluting default setting. His claim to personally making the web 'a better place for everybody' is downright ridiculous; he deserved this wake-up call.
     
  12. Nebulus

    Nebulus Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,582
    Location:
    European Union
    For me it's all about choice, so if the original AdBlock Plus extension allows me to turn off "acceptable ads" feature (and it does), then I see no real problem with that and no reason to switch to Edge.
     
  13. Mman79

    Mman79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    2,016
    Location:
    North America
    What wake-up call? The one where everyone is throwing a fit over it and installing copy-cat AdBlocks that don't have opt-in ad allowances?...Oh wait, no one is. While I do not want to allow ads, I understand why he does it. I understand that if even more people used ad-blocking techniques, you'd start seeing even more websites forcing you to turn it off or go elsewhere.

    Look at No-Script default-allow entries, I'd consider that a worse situation than AdBlock Plus.
     
  14. tlu

    tlu Guest

    As already mentioned, it's easy to uncheck that option if you don't want it. And that Wladimir's idea is "downright ridiculous" is a very questionable statement (and has been discussed in other threads here) as generally blocking all ads could ultimately lead to the end of the free web, indeed. This approach is, at least, worth discussing and not being ridiculed.
     
  15. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    Exactly! :thumb:
     
  16. Mman79

    Mman79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    2,016
    Location:
    North America
    I block all I can for very few, but to me important reasons. For one thing, security. There have been malicious ads aplenty during the growth of online advertising. Another reason is the shift from annoying but basic ads that blinked and scrolled as you went down pages, to full on Flash mini-movies. Even with AdBlock I run into these, and they are a pain to block because often you have to block the entire server or else it'll renew itself and become unblocked. The worst offenders are the ones you go to block and the entire page becomes blank. Last but not least, 3rd party tracking has become what I consider to be a plague and I don't particularly care to expose myself to it when I don't absolutely have to.

    All that being said, it's very much true I believe that we wouldn't like a truly ad-free web.
     
  17. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    I doubt it would result in the end of the free web, as you put it. What would happen is that most (all?) crappy websites would cease to exist. I wouldn't mind that, to be honest... at all.

    All the other great services would survive, because if you do want it to exist, then you'll support it. And, I really doubt that the "acceptable ads" would do any good/bad here. There's no reason to exist. I allow the ads I want to allow for the services that I want to use, not the ads others want me to allow. And, I only allow them, as long as they're first party ads, because ads networks are constantly being hijacked by hackers to serve nice exploits. :) Anyway, if we all do this, allow ads for the services we use, then how will they cease to exist?

    That said, I don't really care about the "acceptable ads". By the way, this feature comes disabled by default in Chrome's extension version.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2012
  18. tlu

    tlu Guest

    If it were limited to "crappy" websites, I would agree. I'm afraid, though, that also many fine websites run by private persons would cease to exist as they would no longer be willing/able to pay for them for all eternity. That would be a great loss.

    Are you sure that you're willing to pay for every great blog you're reading? I doubt that many of us will do that.

    m00n, I'm not sure, either, that "acceptable ads" will change something for the good. But it's a legitimate attempt, IMHO, considering that probably most Adblock users not even think about allowing ads for specific sites. BTW: AFAIK, "acceptable ads" are only first party ads and no ads networks.
     
  19. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    I think I wasn't clear enough. What I mean by supporting the services, is to allow ads (if anyone wants to donate, it's up to them). That's how I support the services I use - by allowing their ads. And, I only allow those I consider to be acceptable. I'm the one to decide it, not somebody else. If anyone visiting their favourite services allow the ads, then all is good, right?

    To be honest, I don't think it will change anything (good/bad). But, that's just me. I can very well be 100% wrong.

    But, let's think for a moment: How will the "acceptable ads" help the services that you actually happen to visit*? Most likely the "acceptable ads" would help other services that you don't visit, at all. So, it's up to you, the visitor of said service, to allow the ads you want to allow. Which is why I'm not sure how useful the "acceptable ads" actually is.

    -edit-

    * The reasoning being that they aren't even in the whitelist. It's actually a rather small whitelist. Do users have any saying in what can be added to the whitelist?
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2012
  20. Pinga

    Pinga Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Posts:
    1,420
    Location:
    Europe
    Nobody has the right to decide for another individual what is 'acceptable', let alone for the entire internet. I for one am offended by such thinking.
     
  21. tlu

    tlu Guest

    Yes.
     
  22. Mman79

    Mman79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    2,016
    Location:
    North America
    Look around you and forget about AdBlock, you're losing the ability to decide what's acceptable more every day.

    I personally think you're slightly making a mountain out of a molehill here. Palant is far from deciding what is acceptable for the entire internet, simply because a small portion of internet users use his program. He's deciding what is acceptable for his program, which he has every right to do. He isn't holding a gun to the head of his users, and, again, there is this option to opt out of the feature. If you want to be upset about a feature you can opt out of, that's well within your rights. But saying a developer doesn't have a right to decide what to do with his own program is rather silly.
     
  23. safeguy

    safeguy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    Posts:
    1,718
    http://adblockplus.org/en/acceptable-ads
    Non-intrusive ads: getting the community involved

    A person may be against the idea behind 'acceptable ads' feature and the motivation in the creation/use of a fork is to indicate this strong opposal/rejection.

    That said however, seeing that the original project (and author/developer) itself respectfully allows the end-user to disable the said feature, the existence/use of a fork in this context is unnecessary.

    If and when users are no longer presented with the ability to do as such (which I do not believe to be the case, and hopefully not), then the existence of a fork may present itself as useful.
     
  24. Pinga

    Pinga Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Posts:
    1,420
    Location:
    Europe
  25. Wild Hunter

    Wild Hunter Former Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2012
    Posts:
    1,375
    Wow, you're ridiculously sensible. He has the right, he is the owner of the product, he makes it. And, those who use lists like EasyList, also admit the right of the lists' maintainers to decide what is unaceptable. What's important is if the user has the right to make his own decisions as well. The "acceptable ads" feature is optional and customizable, just like you can add, remove and customize what lists like EasyList block. They are not forcing anything, the final decision is with the users. That's more than enough freedom.
     
Loading...