About AMON??

With an on-demand scanner, it is not helpful.

It is serious if it is checking with the on-demand scanner when performing an exe file.

It is troubled if undetectable by AMON.

 

I don't think that it's a problem, because if you execute it, AMON will detect independent if are packer or not. Anyway I believe that ESET is working hard for make a better product. I'm happy with nod.

 

It twists [ it is understood and ] and needs.

The extension after UPX compression was carried out is exe.

It is the performed type file which does not need RunTime.

It will be infected if it is performed. AMON cannot prevent it.

It does not detect at the time of opening, either.

It does not detect at the time of execution, either.

It is very dangerous.
I think that a bug is detected only with an on-demand scanner.

Is this the problem of only a Japanese version?

The selling agency (CANON) also understands it.