SG & Firefox: should download & browser hijack protection be turned off?

Discussion in 'SpywareBlaster & Other Forum' started by Devinco, Jul 24, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Devinco

    Devinco Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Posts:
    2,524
    Hi All,

    Spywareguard 2.2 Download and Browser Hijack Protection only works with IE. Since I am only using Firefox 0.9.2 (except for Windows Updates), should I disable (uncheck) the Download and Browser Hijack Protection?

    Also, is this because Firefox does not need Download and Browser Hijack Protection or is it something that will be added in the future?
     
  2. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    Unless I am mistaken the download protection workes on downloads from any browser, I am sure someone else will give you some more info on this.
     
  3. Ronin

    Ronin Guest

    AFAIK the download protection is IE specific only, implemented via a BHO.

    The real time scanning engine works for everything.
     
  4. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    You could be absolutly right ;)
     
  5. Devinco

    Devinco Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Posts:
    2,524
    Thanks BigC and Ronin.

    The memory usage between enabling Download and Browser Hijack Protection and leaving it off seems negligible so it's not a performance issue. Since I'm only using Firefox, I'll leave them off so I don't have a false sense of security later on.

    Do you think that download and browser hijack protection is unnecessary in Firefox (due to it's more secure nature)?
    Or is it something javacool will maybe add to SG in the future?
    If these 2 features (Download Protection and Browser Hijack Protection) will be added in the future to SG, can you recommend something that currently offers these features?
    Sorry for all the questions, I've been studying how to improve my anti-spyware layer.
     
  6. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    Spybot search and destroy. download here
     
  7. Devinco

    Devinco Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Posts:
    2,524
    Thank you BigC.

    I currently have Spybot S&D with TeaTimer, Ad Aware, SpywareBlaster 3.2, and SpywareGuard 2.2.
     
  8. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    You have a good start on defence to keep the nasties out ;) how about process guard and regprot.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.