Why would you have to choose? There are AVs that do both.
A good AV should detect both existing and newly added nasties. Not a very good plan to just put all their effort in new stuff while at the...
That page also open completely here in about 6 seconds here with IMON set to HE.
Click on it to open. You can open it in notepad. There is a sample hosts file which has, "This is a sample HOSTS file used by Microsoft TCP/IP...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosts_file To check just do a search on the hard drive for "HOSTS" files with no extension. Make sure you have...
Long shot.........are you using a HOSTS file that might have an incorrect numeric address for one of the Eset update servers?
It would seem to me that maybe something is changing or removing some registry entries or files?
I have no idea? I am just saying that I have never seen that "Nod start today out of date" issue.
With the ongoing frequency you get this problem it would seem to be something with your machine or applications you are running? I have never...
I still think a concerted effort to add the missed samples from test to test provides an additional degree of protection to the users and is not...
Wouldn't it be better then to just add these threats to be on the safe side for the customers protection rather then making an all encompassing...
But not to even bother to add the missed samples from the prior tests before a new test seems to me a worse case. It looks to me like it is a...
Are you certain that all of those missed samples are not a real threat and that adding them would be just hype and provide zero benefit to the...
To not be "eager" to add the ones they missed also doesn't help with everyday protection. It would seem that Dr.WEB would like to add the ones...
Why doesn't Dr.WEB make more of an effort to add the ones they missed on each test? It would seem to be the prudent thing to do for their customers.
I have used both. My preference is NOD.
It would seem to me that the time on that site doesn't mean that the update servers have been updated at that exact same time. Here is mine set...
Seems ok here. Time Module Event User 11/10/2006 7:29:00 AM Kernel The virus signature database has been successfully updated to version 1861...
Just because you can see a new update on that site doesn't mean that all update servers have it at that exact time.
Because the update hadn't propagate to all update servers.
See: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=879444#post879444
Here are mine. Time Module Event User 11/3/2006 17:01:14 PM Kernel The virus signature database has been successfully updated to version...
Ok here? Time Module Event User 10/27/2006 13:59:31 PM Kernel The virus signature database has been successfully updated to version 1.1842...
I have 4 PCs running different AVs. Using NOD on a high risk gaming machine used by a bunch of teens.:) NOD has kept that PC clean. Also, no slow...
http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=189801874 "Behavior Blockers A behavior blocker is a program that analyzes the behavior of...
Separate names with a comma.