Have other vendors run such tests too. Some will try to cheat, but at least there'd be a bigger sample size and all the manipulations could...
It's not even that it has this feature, it's that they've still not made it optional even though they estimate that the affected users are 'a...
https://xenforo.com/community/threads/gif-avatars-converted-to-jpg-for-posts.14804/
Liking it a lot so far; made my Chrome far lighter on resources.
You could also change your mind to do something different. How do we know that there are more people who can't do any of what they think of doing...
I do not think you got my point. We're talking about a piece of software, not some kitchen knife. Even a small and formerly-unremarkable vendor...
To be fair, F-Secure is hardly the only AV with an ugly 2015 version.
I'm not Chinese/Russian/German, but the first two nations actually put effort into R&D and develop some great talents. Not to mention they have a...
Don't know about other paid AV vendors, but no force can get me to pay a sorry bunch of layabouts who are magnitudes better at table football than...
Just get a better product for your own sake.
Thanks for the reasoned response unlike those of some others I could mention. Sure, it's based on "just" a file detection test, but IIRC...
I wonder how the two-faced cowards Norton and G-Fail would fare according to the data from Sept 2013.
Yup, while Avira's good at detecting game hacking programs, Eset must be strong against all kinds of PUPs/vaguely-malicious stuff.
It's apparently so bad that they had to pull out of AVC.
What does that make G-Fail?
You know, I also hate short-sighted, visionless, R&D-deficient vendors relying solely on stuff they buy with a passion, especially a certain...
ITA. Also another, which is trying to be/do too many things at once. It's not just about the "bloat", but thinking they can produce a security...
Wow, nice cheap shot. :rolleyes: Forgive me for not believing everything the same guy who lied about or at least overestimated their QA methods in...
One is enough, anyway. They wouldn't have phrased it like that if that one really was a corporate solution.
Lol, no I haven't. I've owned up to my mistake about the new "Avira Pro", but there are a lot of old tests on their site where it isn't an issue.
I meant when the paid home version was named 'Avira Pro'.
I may be wrong about that, but my point still stands, because the same thing happened even when it used to mean otherwise.
In before nsm0220 comes in to "defend" his fave free product from healthy criticism in 3...2...1...
Of course both use APC now, but they're also said to use "the same engine" despite scoring differently even on straightforward on-demand tests...
Separate names with a comma.