Thanks appreciate it. I didn't get a warm fuzzy feeling asking this question on the ESET forum.
Yes I'm aware of that. I have a big network at home and jumbo frame support is very useful when transferring files. Now i believe even over a WAN...
Thanks, if Jumbo frames work than I'll upgrade for sure.
I hope I'm posting this in the right forum. I don't see the old ESET forum anymore here. Curious if jumbo frame support is finally implemented...
Ok thanks, I will go ahead and upgrade and see how it goes.
It appears there is no difference in footprint between the different versions. In that case is there any disadvantage with sticking with v4.0?...
Have you tested all 4 versions and have you actually looked at memory usage on each version? Thanks
I see, so it only affects the system when the scan in running. How about when it is idle? I would assume with HIPS enabled it takes more system...
I'm on Eset Smart Security v4.0 and it has served well. I chose it for the protection but more importantly due to the small footprint and resource...
I have been wondering when this will be fixed as well? Any updates?
Separate names with a comma.