NOD updates

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by Stem, Apr 23, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. racketeer66

    racketeer66 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Posts:
    84
    Location:
    Hungary
    U4 the one 2 that rox- that one helped me out. No automatic update seemed to work properly. Just in case:
    Removed - Not an Eset sanctioned server. Please read the Terms Of Service for using these forums. - Ron Surprise:)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 4, 2006
  2. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    Hey that's great - thanks for letting me know :)

    Cheers :)
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2006
  3. cerBer

    cerBer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Posts:
    81
    Could you please explain what you are saying with this strange statement?

    • That there is no such problem as false up to date message?

    • Or, are you saying that who is receiving this message is doing something wrong, or using cracked versions, or simply lying?

    • Or, this means that situation is good enough for you (Eset) and nothing to worry?

    Thanks.
     
  4. racketeer66

    racketeer66 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Posts:
    84
    Location:
    Hungary
    U welcome-just a handy cute Hungarian server in time of need for da chosen:)
     
  5. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    I can abviously not answer on Marcos behalf, but all it means is that the update is available, and that it is definately possible to get it. Just a little patience and it should be a problem no more for any.

    It has already been posted what ESET's position is, that there are currently some extra unforseen things also impacting and that progress is already well underway in the steps to resolve all these things. HTH

    Cheers :)
     
  6. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    PA
    I got the update by choosing u4.eset.com. But why won't automatic updates go to u4 and do the same thing? It's supposed to go on to the next one. I strongly hope these issues are fixed soon.
     
  7. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    Some people get it manually from U4.......so why can't the automatic server selection get it from U4? It's just crazy keeping on stating that's nothing to worry about, as it will update just fine! Well, I got news........it DOES NOT UPDATE and don't start telling me now, that we have to grab back to the good old fashioned hand job in order to get Nod32 updated properly.
    Marcos gets everything automatic......well I guess he's connected to some private Eset servers? If Marcos gets it automatic, why don't others?
    A crazy story as far as I'm concerned and I read too many different things here and would like to really know: What's whato_Oo_O
     
  8. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    That's what I mean, yes! I second this!
     
  9. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    ...I did :ninja:
     
  10. DavidCo

    DavidCo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Posts:
    503
    Location:
    UK
    Time Module Event User
    04/08/2006 20:25:15 Update Error connecting to server u7.eset.com.
    04/08/2006 20:25:13 Update Error connecting to server u4.eset.com.
    04/08/2006 20:25:11 Update Error connecting to server u2.eset.com.
    04/08/2006 20:25:09 Update Error connecting to server u8.eset.com.
    04/08/2006 20:25:07 Update Error connecting to server 82.165.250.33.
    04/08/2006 20:25:07 Update Error connecting to server u3.eset.com.

    cant get 1692
    I am paid up
     
  11. Suggers

    Suggers Guest

    Just tried each server on my desktop now (leaving u4 till last as I know this works)

    Apart from U4 which works fine, I got the same message on the following, no matter how many times I tried:

    u2 - "Your current version of nod32 is up to date. No update necessary."
    u3 - "Your current version of nod32 is up to date. No update necessary."
    82.165.250.33 - "Server connection failure".
    u7 - "Your current version of nod32 is up to date. No update necessary."
    u8 - "Your current version of nod32 is up to date. No update necessary."
    u4 - :thumb:

    P.s. I'm a paid user with a license.

    Suggers
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 4, 2006
  12. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    Mine only looks like that when the internet is down, or for dial-up users when offline, otherwise at the moment I would expect something more like attached.

    Cheers :)
     

    Attached Files:

  13. DavidCo

    DavidCo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Posts:
    503
    Location:
    UK
    Well, as you can see internet is not down etc, getting emails as well.
    8Mb adsl.
    This occurs a lot here (UK)
    I usually have to manually update!

    Here goes a try at manual, any bets on the message.

    Message reads - "Your version of Nod32 is up to date.............."
    Ho-hum:p
     
  14. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    Indeed...
    But those errors normally mean that the server was entirely non-contactable...
    can you at least ping one of them?
     
  15. Detox

    Detox Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    8,507
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Me too - all of them so far. I won't try to say there hasn't been some sort of problem but I would hazard a guess that it is definitely not universal.
     
  16. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    PA
    Detox:

    Well, this is too widespread for comfort. I and the others reporting in are paid users, too. Frustrating.
     
  17. rothko

    rothko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Posts:
    579
    Location:
    UK
    probably not, but it is certainly a new problem that started around the time of the large update (1.1678 on July 25th). I am one of the users that have found updating a bit of a problem and it was since that update that things started going downhill...

    something has changed, and i know ESET will sort it out, but for now i have to update manually from whichever server that lets me do so (if i want the update at the time it comes out)

    Lee
     
  18. Suggers

    Suggers Guest

    I'm a real fan of nod32, the best antivirus software I've ever used, I've got it on my desktop and laptop (both paid versions), I fully accept technical problems as they are inevitable no matter which software you choose.

    What I do find frustrating is when paid users, like myself, post on here and get responses such as 'not universal/widespread' and 'using cracks', etc, which implies that the problem is not important/big enough, or, that anyone suffering problems is using illegal cracked versions/free trials.

    I live in U.K., I have noticed several other users with problems from the UK so perhaps it is a UK issue??

    Cheers :)
     
  19. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    It's an issue in The Netherlands as well. And the responses from the Eset guys are not what they should be.
    If there's a problem, just state that, but don't give replies like there's nothing going on.
     
  20. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    So......and what are you trying to say? I don't like suggestions like that. Just admit there's a problem!
     
  21. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    PA
    I agree with Suggers - technical problems happen with all AVs, but a problem must be admitted here. I have licenses for NOD32 and KIS (my personal fav, but not sure KIS will work right on my computer,) and the response to problems affects my decision.
     
  22. De Hollander

    De Hollander Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Posts:
    718
    Location:
    Windmills and cows
    Mmmmmm o_O

    After reading this tread, (pc was online for more as an hour) I decided to hit the update button. It connected to U4 and the reply: Your version of Nod32 is up to date.
    Attempt nr 2: It connected to U8 and the reply: Your version of Nod32 is up to date
    Attempt nr:3 It connected to U4 and the reply: Your version of Nod32 is up to date
    Attempt nr 4: It connected to U8 and the reply: Your version of Nod32 is up to date
    Attempt nr 5: It connected to U3: 1.1692 (20060804)
     
  23. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    He is not implying anything other than when he tested it and retested it, it worked for him.

    I'd simply like to say to everyone, give Eset some breathing space, they will get this resolved and back to normal as soon as they can.

    Blackspear.
     
  24. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    Please read THIS POST for a response by Eset.

    Blackspear.
     
  25. Gez

    Gez Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Posts:
    65
    Location:
    Ireland
    Still having problems with NOD updates, ever since I discovered last week that the program hadn't been updated in a month. Now I understand that NOD's strength is its heuristic ability to detect malware, which makes it less dependent on signature updates, and i can go without a day or two of updates for that reason. And if Eset have problems I can live with that too -- no problem. But what I can't abide is being told by the program that I am up-to-date when i am not, and also being indirectly accused by some in here of having cracked software. I bought my NOD in january after reading the many recommendations in here and to be frank I expected an awful lot better than the insulting and dismissive attitude of some of NOD's staunchest defenders here.
    Anyway, back to my problem. I've uninstalled NOD 3 times cleanly, and reinstalled with the commercial version each time. On each occasion NOD will update to the latest version successfully the first time the computer restarts, but subsequently NOD will not update at all. No matter what server I choose, or whether update servers are set to automatic or not. When I try manually updating by spamming the update button I can see for a split second that NOD does reach the servers -- u2.eset.com, u8.eset.com, etc. Not always, but most of the time anyway. So no problem with firewalls or anything. And if there was some kind of a problem along those lines, I wouldn't get the full update after a reinstall anyway. Today I'm sitting on 1.1691, having reinstalled last night. 1.1692 is available but I keep being told my NOD is up-to-date. Yet if I reinstall I know that within five minutes my NOD will be up to version 1.1692, proving that my previous installation **WAS NOT UP TO DATE**
    So what's the story? What's going on and is anybody prepared to tell the truth about this serious update issue, which is not a matter of servers but rather an issue of reliability and trustworthiness. When a program is able to check the servers for updates and then tells me I am up to date when i am not then to me that is a lie and a huge breach of trust ***which calls into question the reliability and integrity of other aspects of the program***
    I have no personal grudge with Eset, and NOD is still just about hanging on as my preferred antivirus, but I would like an answer to this question, and not one that tries to pull the wool over our eyes or diverts our attention to some other irrelevant aspect of the program.
    Thanks.
    Gez
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.