Rollback rx

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by gergy, Dec 21, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Longboard

    Longboard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Posts:
    3,238
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    @Chris

    Any further input from Terabyte re RBack interaction conflict and image restore?

    @Starfish

    Any further news from you about your restore using IFW with RBack installed?

    Regards
     
  2. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    I've just bought a new hard disk (should come at the weekend) I'm going to have another go at imaging with TI and then Drive Snapshot and then a restore - When I have a full clone as a backup.
     
  3. mikisu

    mikisu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney.
    If you are using TI and Rollback-the trick is to boot from the Acronis media disc before Windows starts-you can then creaste an image or restore one,without conflicting with RB,as RB is inactive through Windows not having started.

    The TI disc is Linux written and contains its own mini OS.


    Mike

    .
     
  4. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    Thanks but I image to a Netgear SC101 this requires a windows driver so - TI will not work with RX present

    Drive Snapshot will image from windows and usually restores ok from a PE disk

    I also have some where Ghost 9 might work?
     
  5. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    I want to ask one question. I clicked properties of my HD( C)and there is an option "Compress Drive to save Disk Space" I found this option unchecked. I think it should be marked "checked" instead of being unchecked. Am I right? If I am right, is it something related to installation of RollbackRx as I don,t rememberr to make this option unchecked.

    Another question that is not related but I want to aks when I marked this option checked and then click apply( including all subfolders etc), it started to apply and it showed it will take many hours( more than 4 or even more), so I cancelled the process. Is this time( required to aplly the option) normal?

    I will be thankful for the help.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. mikisu

    mikisu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney.
    This option is not Rollback related but,is a standard Windows feature and enables compression of all your files to save a small amount of space.

    This is generally considered a BAD idea,as it slows everything down ,in view of the fact that a lot of files have to be DE compressed before use.

    In any case a lot of files are already compressed,music,photos etc.

    Probably a carry over option from the Win 98 days,when hard discs were expensive.

    Now just get another EL CHEAPO additional disc,so compressing would seem to be pointless in the extreme:D

    The indexing service is enabled on my disc and the service should be enabled.

    Mike

    .
     
  7. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Mike, while I fully agree with your comments re disk compression, I disagree with your parting comment re the (file) indexing service.

    The indexing service only benefits Windows Search Tool, but at the cost of stealing CPU cycles and sometimes causing hdd thrashing while (needlessly) indexing. Imho, a much better alternative is to turn off the indexing service and instead of using Windows Search Tool, use the FREE AgentRansack...
    http://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/default.aspx

    ~pv
     
  8. Kenjin

    Kenjin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Posts:
    63
    i think it should not be marked as Rollback does not support NTFS drive compression, only file/folder compression: http://www.rollbacksoftware.com/kb/questions/150/Windows-File-Systems-supported..
     
  9. mikisu

    mikisu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney.
    ~pv


    Had another look at indexing services and you are quite correct-just shows what habit can do!

    Mike

    edit;Agent Ransack is FAST!

    .
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2006
  10. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Thanks for all the info.
     
  11. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Glad you like it. ;)
     
  12. PeterVO

    PeterVO Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Posts:
    87
    Location:
    Belgium, Leuven
  13. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Its, fast but I found two things in very short test with OS built in search.

    1- It requires exact file name( even Capital letters count) or U are going to miss the results.
    2- It does miss some results.

    It,s just a very minimal use experience.
    Edit: Point no.2 may not be so correct as I saw windows serched files were ffom history and the files actually did not exis, but I am not forgetting there were soem real files too!! May eb some bosy using it regularly can guess better.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2006
  14. mikisu

    mikisu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney.
    Yes that has quite AMAZING speed!!
     
  15. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    The link is dead for me.

    Says "Redirect Failed"
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2006
  16. beetlejuice69

    beetlejuice69 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    780
    Take the dot away from the end of org and it`ll work.
     
  17. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Thanks
     
  18. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
  19. mikisu

    mikisu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney.
    Would think the files will automatically decompress,when required,without any problems,but turn off the option.

    Personally,wouldnt worry!

    A question for pvsurfer re the indexing service being turned off

    I turned off the service for drive C AND for files and folders(which is a seperate sub option) and had problems with misc utilities corrupting,as a result of the files and folders being de-indexed(tested this several times in conjunction with RollBack)-also the used disc space increased(would have thought the reverse).

    Would you have any idea whats happening?Sounds like caution must be applied!

    Not a worry as I have repaired in conjunction with RollBack.

    Mike

    .
     
  20. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Mike, can you be more specific about the corruption since turning off indexing service?

    Also, do you have Agent Ransack installed, Locate32, or both of them?
     
  21. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    AR is case insensitive in its default operation, although under the Options Tab you can specify it to 'Match Case'. So if it actually missed anything because of upper/lower case discrepancies, just make sure that Match Case is not checked. Once you learn to use it properly, I believe you will find its searches to be very fast and very accurate!
     
  22. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Hey Guys

    Hate to be a spoil sport, but the mods will come a knocking. Been a whole bunch of posts that have absolutely nothing to do with Rollback. The indexing stuff should be in another thread.

    Pete
     
  23. mikisu

    mikisu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney.
    Well,specifically,an accounts page became missing in Quicken.

    It was fully restored with Rollback,as was the Full indexing service.

    As soon as I de-indexed,this Quicken header "My Finances page", again deleted itself.

    I tried this cycle several times with identical results,so am fairly sure its to do with de-indexing.

    The dangerous option is to apply changes to both drive C,PLUS subfolders and files.

    At the moment I have only turned off indexing for drive c-but have not touched the sub folders and files option,and Quicken is working normally.

    A few other minor quirks turned up,but I am unsure if indexing was the cause;

    (1) Not being able to easily write a post for this forum,for example or typing in a search subject etc,as lines of unwanted letters, repeated themselves at computer speed to fill the page, unless stopped.

    (2)Not being able to specify to which folder,except for my Documents,several programs(PDF Creator,Purrint) saved to.

    At the time,I was testing one or both of the other searchers.

    Currnetly, have none installed and the only problem remaining is (2).

    I have been using the Indexing Service for many years,which probably doesnt help as regards decommissioning.

    Thanks for your help pv

    Mike

    PS have succesfully used RollBack about 7 times this week-its working perfectly:D

    Just to prove we are still on topic.But do you want to open up a new thread pv or just answer this post?

    .

    .
     
  24. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Mike, this is really OT, so let me just say...

    .....you have mail
     
  25. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    Well I now have 3 hardisks to play with so I have taken a number of backups and completed a number of restores.

    Drive Snaphot images from within Windows and restores from the BART PE recovery disk fine - RB has no snapshots and needs to be installed again.


    True Image 9.1 Corporate will not image from within windows or the recovery disk but will Clone and restore fine.

    But on my system undertaking the clone leaves the last snapshot on the original disk corrupt so I have to rollback the snapshot to an earlier version - not a pleasant moment. And I tried it again same problem x 2.

    On the restored drive - RB has no snapshots and needs to be installed again. Also Kaspersky lost it license for some reason. ​

    At the moment I thinking of adding a Fat partition and trying HDS clone out on that
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.