Nod32 Is Not Detect viruses on these web site

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by shanijee, Mar 7, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nameless

    nameless Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Posts:
    1,233
    There is a grain of truth to that, but it's impossible to always be "fully aware" of what you are doing. When several big-name, reputable sites were hacked a couple years ago (I can't remember the name of the incident, but it was an IIS server exploit, I think), the people who regularly visited those sites had every expectation that no harm would come to their systems when they visited that day. It would have been impossible for them to be "fully aware" that the site would suddenly have malware.

    It's quite easy to visit a site without knowing that it's "dodgy".

    It's just kind of frustrating to witness the difference in the level of responsiveness from one company to the next. The difference is absolutely dramatic. I'll shutup now so Eset doesn't start wishing me dead.

    I rely on 0, unless you count NOD32. Besides, here we're talking about real-time AV protection, and as we all know, you really can't run more than one of those at a time.
     
  2. nameless

    nameless Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Posts:
    1,233
    I'm at a loss to understand what this means. I'm not a lab, I'm just a user who encountered an undetected malicious script, and submitted it. I agree that it shouldn't have higher priority than more-widespread malware, of course, but... Never mind, there is no point in complaining, since it won't do any good. You do what you can with the resources you have, I understand. The execs at the top are the ones who have to decide whether to hire more personnel, or buy another 60-foot yacht.
     
  3. flyrfan111

    flyrfan111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,229
    I thought it was only a 58 footer!!!
     
  4. peewee

    peewee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Posts:
    30

    Hi shanijee; do you really think it is right for you to take up time with NOD tech support when using and spreading cracked versions?I think the support people's time is better spent on paying customers, but that's just my opinion.
     
  5. shanijee

    shanijee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Posts:
    107
    Location:
    Faisalabad(Pakistan)
    cracked version?
    witch cracked version
    spreading cracked versions?
    i am not spreading cracked versions
    man you shake your mind*puppy*
    you have no oponion to talk like that
    i am a register user
     
  6. peewee

    peewee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Posts:
    30
    I have links to posts with you uploading cracks for others to use. "shanijee make things easy" sound familiar? I'd rather not post the links here because they don't allow warez/crack links at Wilders.
     
  7. wolfeyes89

    wolfeyes89 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Posts:
    22
    OMG dont u c hes just another nod 32 hater and he just made all of u respond to this and go any further locking dwn the thread would have been a smart choice but i respect the moderators thta didnt because this shows thta this forum is 100% public and more helpful than others now just ignore ~snip~ and stop giving him what he wants.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 9, 2006
  8. scoopnoggin

    scoopnoggin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Posts:
    28
    Yeah looking at the links through Google I'd say he is using a cracked version. Pretty ballsy to come on Eset's forum talking smack while using a crack. Or really stupid.
     
  9. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    Fully agree with that.

    Well, this was my point...they SHOULD do their best. ;)
    I understand ESET needs more employees or something but no matter how many samples they receive and no matter how many employees they have 7 days it's enough I think to analyse some samples.

    It's better to concentrate on this issue rather than releasing a new version. For me 2.5 with more concern on adding samples it would be perfect, and I guess for 90% of all the users.
    But anyway, I heared nobody complaining he/she got infected using NOD, so it's very good, but needs some improvements.

    I'm saying this because Marcos once stated: "You will some improvements to adding samples soon." That was a while ago and I'm still waiting.... :D
     
  10. wxboss

    wxboss Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Posts:
    33
    Location:
    Jacksonville, FL
    NOD's a great product, and their history shows this. Yet, pcsupport brought up a valid point that I think most of us acknowledge - there is no miracle program that stops everything.

    Layers, and various other specialized programs that deal specifically with spyware, trojans and their ilk are needed to supplement and strengthen our security.

    NOD is great IMHO, but it shouldn't be the only thing running on our pcs to keep them clean and secure.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.