defragmentation and data

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by clique, Mar 3, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. clique

    clique Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    39
    I think this make sense. I understand from your statements that leave Windows to do their job. In another words Windows defragmenter is the best pet because it’s apart of Windows and knows Windows better

    On another side, I did read carefully the above replies and set three machines with different defragmenter on each, later and after several hours of work on each machine I found that regardless of what defragmenter were used Windows always put files back in the same position that Windows defragmenter used to locate them. Has any one noticed such behaviour? Thank you
     
  2. Howard Kaikow

    Howard Kaikow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Posts:
    2,802
    Not quite.

    THe built-in windows defragger is a watere down version of Diskeeper Lite.
    Read the papers I pointed to at the Perfect Disk site.
    Other papers are available at th eO& O Defrag and Diskeeper sites.

    The built-in defragger is a very inferior critter.
     
  3. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    wouldnt it just make sense to use one defragger so files arent moved back and forth?
     
  4. Howard Kaikow

    Howard Kaikow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Posts:
    2,802
    Using more than one defragger will result in lots of needless file movement.

    Each defragger does things differently.
    One has to read the papers to which I referenced to judge which defragger is best.
     
  5. clique

    clique Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    39
    1-I’m using one defragger. but my job requires some times to”slice” /resize/merge/etc. hard drives. So while I was searching for a good defragger to push all data toward the front first. I found out that regardless the defragmenter you use Windows defragmenter finally RULES i.e after few hours of works if you go back and see the disk analysis screen shot, you’ll be surprised to find that the analysis is exactly as if the HD is defragged with Windows defragmenter. Sorry for weak English. Hope I made it clear this time

    2-if you’r willing to divide/resize/merge/etc. the SUPER BEST defragger is “dirms” Thank you iceni60

    3- the HD in question has been merged and resized in “real time” usin PartionMagic but data first was pushed using “dirms” without a problem. Sorry other defragmenters didn’t quite do the job. dirms is free, very small, no installation, no mess, pushes every thing to the beginning of HD, doesn’t add any files to the system and leaves the customer’s computer clean because all you need is to delete the file it self from C:windows\system32 and that’s it. Thank you again iceni60
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2006
  6. Howard Kaikow

    Howard Kaikow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Posts:
    2,802

    THat's not the case.

    THe built-in windows defragger does not display the info necessary to see what has been done.

    THe differences are quire demonstratable, just read the papers at the Perfect Disk and O & O Defrag and Diskeeper web sites.

    Download the trial versions to see the differences.

    Start wit Perfect disk.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.