A complete security suite wanted

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by diddlydumdum, Feb 3, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. diddlydumdum

    diddlydumdum Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Posts:
    24
    Hi Nameless,

    No offence taken :) As I keep saying, I'm a complete and utter novice.

    I find that some registry cleaners / optimisers / whatever do in fact help, if only to a limited extent. I run Xp Pro Sp2 with an AMD 3500+ and 1 GB of RAM and no games - I'm far, far too old for that. Nonetheless, I find that after about six months or so the system starts to slow down noticeably. I then run a cleaner and hey presto, it's almost as good as new again.

    This is not to negate your view on cleaners, not at all :). I can only remark on my own observations.

    Diddlydumdum
     
  2. piktor

    piktor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Posts:
    45
    Location:
    Germany
    ... maybe Eset will build a complete new Operatingsystem :p which is 100% compatible to Windows o_O without its negative features :cool: because they know how it works :doubt: so there is no problem to do it :D

    -piktor-
     
  3. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Microsoft's code is not free y'know....One would have to pay money (which will be enough to make 1000 businessmen bankrupt) to port the Win32 API to whatever operating system is currently being run. All the hooks will have to be converted into commands appropriate for the OS in use, potentially slowing down the system. It costs a lot and takes many years to make.

    Hence it is better to simply keep developing on current APIs (and make separate versions for each platform) rather than modify it to run on may platforms so that a single application would run well on all operating systems without having to download separate versions for that platform. :p
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2006
  4. piktor

    piktor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Posts:
    45
    Location:
    Germany
    hey Firecat, this was quite a joke :D this was alluded to the wish that Eset should integrate a registry optimizer, because they have the knowledge of the registry ;)

    -piktor-

    btw I'll think happy bytes will make this on his way to work and at his way home he will translate it into serveral languages *gggg*
     
  5. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I understand piktor. :)
     
  6. diddlydumdum

    diddlydumdum Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Posts:
    24
  7. diddlydumdum

    diddlydumdum Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Posts:
    24
    Aah yes, Piktor will hef hees liddle joke. Still, from what I can see, it appears that Eset are in the process of developing a suite - if they haven't already.

    Diddles
     
  8. ejr

    ejr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Posts:
    538
    I agree on the complete suite. But in my opinion, a security suite need only be:

    1. Firewall
    2. Antivirus
    3. Anti-spyware

    No need for an optimizer, spam filter, registry cleaner or anything else. Just my opinion.
     
  9. diddlydumdum

    diddlydumdum Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Posts:
    24
    Hello ejr,

    Thank you for your post.

    As far as I am concerned, your opinion is as valid as any other. I agree entirely with you that a suite should have an anti-virus, an anti-spyware and a firewall component.

    Regards,
    Diddlydumdum
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.