NOD improving at Jotti!

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by kalpik, Aug 17, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kalpik

    kalpik Registered Member

    Is it just me? I have noticed that NOD has improved a LOT, looking at Jotti! There are now *very* few things it misses! Now now... i dont want any screenshots from jotti or any flame wars! This is just what i noticed in the recent past. Its really good. Good work ESET! Keep it up! :D ;)
     
  2. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    The ESET team are improving its detection and now the Linux version also detect Adware and Spyware... ;)
     
  3. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    I just took a look - NOD detected Win32/Spy.PerfKey.N :p
     
  4. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Great :D

    The ESET team are doing a great job! :p
     
  5. kalpik

    kalpik Registered Member

    Yeah! And maybe the stuff it misses are False Positives and/or Damaged Samples!
     
  6. Patrician

    Patrician Registered Member

    No they aren't. NOD still misses plenty .
     
  7. .....

    ..... Registered Member

    Like every other anti-virus in the world.

    Jotti's stats are flawed, its not a way of comparing anti-viruses and their detection ratios.
     
  8. Carloswoody

    Carloswoody Registered Member

    IM new everyone. Hello, now on to my question. What do you mean? :p
     
  9. SDS909

    SDS909 Registered Member

    It's just you. NOD32 still misses 90% of what I submit.
     
  10. kalpik

    kalpik Registered Member

    Hmm.. maybe. Well the av-comparitive tests are due in a few days. Lets see how NOD32 performs there!
     
  11. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Kalpik, maybe you should take a look at this regarding Jotti's and statistics from there.

    I don't think you have to worry about Av-comparatives test, they always do well in this particular test. :)
     
  12. Ned Slider

    Ned Slider Registered Member

    Of course it will also depend on what's being submitted. Jotti states on his site (FAQ) that on average two samples per day are missed by ALL AV products included on his site. This is because they are so new as to not be in ANY of their databases of definitions yet.

    Ned
     
  13. Technodrome

    Technodrome Security Expert

    Some antiviruses (F-Prot in particular) miss many samples when you scan them at jotti.org . Windows version of F-Prot detects them just fine…



    tECHNODROME
     
  14. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    That is why I prefer VirusTotal... ;)
     
  15. Ned Slider

    Ned Slider Registered Member

    F-Prot (Linux version) detects 89.7% of samples in my virus collection. I've not tried the Windows version for comparison.

    Ned
     
  16. Kye-U

    Kye-U Security Expert

    I think that's because most of them are packed/compressed.
     
  17. Ned Slider

    Ned Slider Registered Member

    No - it's not that. I have no trouble detecting packed/compressed samples with F-Prot on linux - it detects those by default (no additional command line switches required). Only thing it can't do is delete viruses from a compressed archive (or at least the free version can't which I assume is what Jotti's site is running).

    Ned
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice