SpywareBlaster 3.4 released!

Discussion in 'SpywareBlaster & Other Forum' started by javacool, May 14, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SpongeBob

    SpongeBob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Posts:
    24
    I tried manually adding sbautoupdate to NIS2005 but as soon as I added it this caused Norton to stop responding, restart wouldn't work, etc so I had to pull the plug.

    After PC booted, I disabled Norton & checked list of permitted programs but sbautoupdater.exe wasn't on there, so I added it myself while norton was still disabled, this time it added ok and norton didn't lock up. Rebooted and tried to do update from SpywareBlaster, Norton asked if I wanted to allow SpywareBlaster to perform a DNS lookup (strange as I'd told it to allow SwB all access on all ports), I clicked yes/allow SpywareBlaster, but then nothing happened (just the hourglass) SwB had stopped responding!

    I give in.. it seems the only way to update is to disable NIS2005 as previously mentioned. As I said before there was never a problem with previous versions of SpywareBlaster, something has difeinitely changed which Norton doesn't like.
     
  2. Neverforget

    Neverforget Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Posts:
    11
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    Yes, I definitely disabled Norton firewall and turned on Windows XP firewall for some protection while I added sbautoupdate.exe to Norton firewall, then turned XP firewall off when I re-enabled Norton. I didn't even try to DL the update on my own from the SB program. I just re-enabled autoupdate in startup, then re-booted and it did it on its own. I have not yet attempted to update from the program again, because there is no update available and I don't want to get stuck and have to do another re-boot. I did just reboot a while ago and I got the popup message from SB saying it had inspected and set the database of protected items (or something close to that).
     
  3. SpongeBob

    SpongeBob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Posts:
    24
    Ah, there's the difference... the problem is with manual updating from within SpywareBlaster. The procedure used for manual updates used to work great, but it must have changed, and norton no longer likes it :'(

    I can't find any issues related to SpywareBlaster on symantec's site, but then again I didn't expect to... javacool offers better support than symantec, so I find I get more sense here.
     
  4. javacool

    javacool BrightFort Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Posts:
    4,098
    Well it's actually a rather strange difference, because there aren't any differences in the actual code used to download the latest updates that should be able to cause such an issue (between AutoUpdate and SpywareBlaster - so if one works, the other definitely should as well).

    In regard to changes between SpywareBlaster 3.3 and 3.4 in the updating code, I don't see why any of them should be able to cause this either.

    And here's an interesting note: I just tested SpywareBlaster 3.4 with Norton Internet Security 2005, and I haven't encountered any issues. :blink: After I added spywareblaster.exe to the permitted programs listing, it works fine (besides the slow-down of the system that accompanies NIS).

    It really sounds like what we've uncovered is either: Norton not playing nicely on some systems, or a critical Norton bug. But that said, you can be sure that I'm looking into this issue, and trying to reproduce it. (Although you might have more success by contacting Symantec, as all of my tests so far have been without any problems.)

    Best regards,

    -Javacool
     
  5. iwod

    iwod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Posts:
    708
    any news on Auto Install via command switch?
     
  6. zeekfu

    zeekfu Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Posts:
    2
    -I see you are not running Norton, but the common denominator with you is adaware, spybot s&d. I am wondering if it could be these who SwB is not getting on with? just a thought.
    -----------------
    Good point, Spongebob-

    I'm not sure if it is a coincidence or not but I just downloaded the newest freeware version of add-aware which is 1.06 and now the update on my newly updated spywareblaster seems to be working properly. I should have re-checked the update feature first, as it could be totally unrelated. At any rate all three (ad-aware, spybot search and destroy and spywareblaster) seem to be working harmoniously and flawlessly as usual again. Three cheers for freeware and the heroes of the internet world.
     
  7. Alec McLean

    Alec McLean Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Posts:
    1
    Totally agree with this response. NIS Firewall had blocked updated AdAware and SpywareBlaster 3.4 both of which had worked perfectly in previous versions. Solution for me was to go to Configure in NIS Personal Fireware and make sure AdAware Permit All was selected. That fixed Adawre, but not SpywareBlaster. I then removed SpywareBlaster from the NIS list did a re-boot, went back to MIS Personal Firewall Configure selected Add and pulled in SpywareBlaster.exe. I started up SpywareBlaster clicked Update then Options and checked Alternative Dowload Method. SpywareBlaster Update then went smoothly.

    This is not a SpywareBlaster issue but a NIS issue. SpywareBlaster remains King.
     
  8. megaman

    megaman Guest

    hey guys i had a quick question is it ok after i manually update my def. in spyware blaster if i hit enable all protection each time i get a new update. i wonder if i should go through one by one checking off the new updates or is it ok to hit enable all, it wont mess up the protection will it. any repsonse would help thanks
     
  9. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Enable all is the way to go. ;)

    If something is unchecked it will show on the Protection option anyway.


    snowbound
     
  10. megaman

    megaman Guest

    i dont know about you guys but version 3.2 was working the fastest on my pc after the update to 3.3 my update process became slow and when i open the program its slower to load the database, but other than that this is a great program just wondering when they will update their mru program, you know that program has no icon for it, doesnt show up on my pc, is a white box is all. they need to start working on that pronto and give it an icon look, its looks wierd on my pc.
     
  11. KB Invader9

    KB Invader9 Guest

    when I try to run the program I get:

    error creating registry key HKey_Local_Machine\Software\Microsoft|Windows\CurrentVersion\uninstall\SpywareBlaster_is1 Reg create Key Ex Failed; Code 5 Access is denied

    Any one got any ideas

    Thanks KB
     
  12. spinround86

    spinround86 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2
    I have the version 3.4 of SpyWare Blaster too and having trouble using the manual update for definitions. I keep getting msgs about 'cannot est a connection' and 'error connecting to update server'. I'm using Win XP Home Edition and using Sygate Personal FireWall and Norton Antivirus. Suggestions are welcome!
     
  13. Carver

    Carver Guest

    I am using SpywareBlaster 3.4, I am using Windows XP service pack 2, I am using Outpost Pro firewall. I am updating it manually and I have no problem. Spinround86 problem may be due to the firewall so try and shut it down update SpywareBlaster, then start it again. See if that works.
     
  14. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Also there is manual updates over here,

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12266


    snowbound
     
  15. spinround86

    spinround86 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2
    Yep tried that; switched off the firewall and tried to update but to no avail.

    EDIT: Just read snowbound's post..gonna try that!

    EDIT2: Alright! It worked! Now it shows "SpywareBlaster database loaded 5/30/05". Does this mean I have to download the 5 individual files each time. Hmm going to be a bit of a bother there. o_O
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2005
  16. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Another thing u can try is open your SpywareBlaster interface, click on Updates>Options and choose another method for download.


    snowbound
     
  17. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    5/30/05 would be correct and unfortunately unless u can update through the program i see no other way than the manual downloads. :doubt:


    snowbound
     
  18. Detox

    Detox Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    8,507
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Editorialization post by guest "shaw" has been removed. Software bashing is against our TOS and speculative bashing is truly the worst. Let's remain on topic here in the SWB 3.4 release thread.
     
  19. gonzo1963

    gonzo1963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Posts:
    7
    ¿Are OK the links to perform manual updates in this post for the new version?
    Best Regards.
     
  20. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Yes they are. ;) :D


    snowbound
     
  21. huggybear

    huggybear Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2004
    Posts:
    4
    Well, a new version of SWB right on the heels of the last update -- IMPRESSED! But then again, I am at a loss... I made a post on 2005.03.14 right after the last version of SWB (3.3) was released as to WHY the silent install feature was removed.

    (https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=70865)

    My post was followed by an overwhelming response from the user community asking the very same question?!!? We were answered with a very legitimate answer from Javacool as to the reason (bundling and/or silent UN-installing, etc.). While this answer surficed the question as to why it was removed, I was under the impression that the concensus solution would be to disable ONLY the silent UN-install in the next version of SWB.

    While I have NO problem with a disabled silent UN-install, having the silent INSTALL disabled does make my deployment of the program MUCH more difficult. Admittedly, since my discovery of a missing silent install from SWB 3.3, I have all but halted use of the program throughout my organization.

    Eagerly awaiting the next version to hopefully resolve this overlook has now only left me disappointed in the new version SWB 3.4 which ALSO has NO SILENT INSTALL available!!

    Honestly, I will totally applaud Javacool on a sensational product and in their battle against spyware, adware, and other nasty software. I believe on the home user front this product is near unbeatable! But, alas, I am afraid that without a simple setup option (i.e. silent install) deployment at my organization will probably all but totally fall to the wayside as another program that did not fulfill the hopes we had.

    I will continue to visit the message boards for a short time as a new option is hoped. But seeing my desire for a software to fulfill my needs and my already lessening forum visits since the disappointment in 3.3, I see myself less frequenting the SWB world even more.

    -MH
     
  22. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    I'm not sure what gave you that impression :doubt:

    Javacool did leave you hope in the post he made that the silent install might return.

    Re: No Silent Install?!?!
     
  23. l.A MAN

    l.A MAN Guest

    well detox thanks for deleting shaws message, cant handle the truth ha, i mean everything he said was true, so i dont think you should knock down anyone posting, it is true that spybots immunization feature does in fact immunize against 6995 types of attacks, while spyware blaster only 3598 or so. so the clear winner is in deed spybot. Also how about updating your programs like mru blaster at least give it an icon, and spyware guard ok whats the deal with that. Spyware guard is useless hasnt been updated in years and the program hasnt either. You programs are excellent and wonderful and i thank you for that but please dont give out outdated softwares.
     
  24. dog

    dog Guest

    Actually your fact is INCORRECT Spybot's immunization feature only does slightly over 2000 ... there is an error with version 1.4 where Spybot counts the Immunization for each user account, so if three accounts are present (this includes the default/hidden Admin account) the number presented is 6000 something, but it's just an accounting error.

    Why do you go over to NI, Spybot's support forum and investigate a ~little~ further.

    As for your other comments ... :doubt: they are slightly off-base too. But to each his own ... if you're gonna have a strong opinion, and basically just bash a product, shouldn't you a least educate yourself about them first.


    :ninja:
     
  25. snowboard

    snowboard Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Posts:
    160
    Javacool doesnt have time to update all his products at once. He even said he will update MRU-Blaster soon, just chill and wait for a update.

    SpywareGuard protects you from various attacks. And doesnt really need to be updated as much as the other products need to.

    Regards,

    snowboard
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.