GlassWire

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by Feandur, Aug 23, 2014.

  1. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,511
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Well it was OutBound Only and this year they introduced InBound and I assume they still have to use Windows Firewall API like other software firewalls. You can read but they don't actually say: https://www.glasswire.com/best-firewall-software/
     
  2. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    18,565
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    OK I see, a bit weird because the Windows Firewall has always managed both inbound and outbound access, but I guess you can now configure it. But it's still not a standalone firewall. In other words, if Windows Firewall gets bypassed, I assume you're still toast.
     
  3. Rules

    Rules Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Posts:
    790
    Location:
    Earth
    Version 3.7.880 - (August 27, 2025)
    GlassWire - Personal Firewall & Network Monitor
    • Added support for monitoring running applications with no network activity in the GlassWire Protect section.
    • Added ability to export network scanner results to a CSV file.
    • Fixed an installer resolution issue on high DPI displays.
    • Fixed a UI distortion issue after resuming from sleep mode.
    • Fixed various UI issues with popups and traffic monitoring graph.
    • Fixed compatibility issues on x64 ARM processors.
     
  4. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,511
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I actually don't like this version way to many Blocked and pop-ups when Ask To Connect is Enabled I might go back a version... https://forum.glasswire.com/t/v3-7-880-blocking-tons-by-itself/21026
     
  5. Lagavulin16

    Lagavulin16 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Posts:
    221
    Location:
    Emerald City
    As an aside Rasheed, I've been an avid fan of your inquisitive and infallible logic. Perhaps at this point Wilders should consider sending you a monthly check in the mail. Just kidding. Seriously though, you're a stalwart asset to the Wilders community and appreciate your contributed postings accordingly.
    Please keep that torch burning.
     
  6. Rules

    Rules Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Posts:
    790
    Location:
    Earth
    @Triple Helix
    Yes, i saw this thread yesterday, couldn't agree anymore, waiting for a next version, why they mix applications with no network ?, why not separate them ?
     
  7. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    18,565
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Well, I wouldn't say my logic is always infallible LOL, but thanks. But about GlassWire, it is indeed a front-end for the Windows Firewall (similar to Windows Firewall Control), but it would be nice if it added basic protection against malware trying to evade the firewall.
     
  8. Surt

    Surt Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Posts:
    503
    Location:
    USA
    I agree. Active for what the user sets upon first-access for user apps, as it has been for so long. And another to-be-named for what're GW's new out-of-the-box rules and changing either rule would move the app to Active, and back into the to-be named when deemed Inactive.

    I found Taylor's post on the GW forum of interest
    https://forum.glasswire.com/t/v3-7-880-blocking-tons-by-itself/21026/8
    in that a first-access challenge is evoked on a GW-blocked process. Perhaps the same is evoked for the GW-allowed processes. In either case, it seems the user can select which rule to proceed with. Note that in the pop-up it is not evident which rule was set by GW and Taylor didn't screen shoot the drop-down caret content.

    Meanwhile, these Defender events for service and def updates began to show up in Log Analysis last week having never done so prior. Not a problem, of course. But it sure loads up the Uninstalled Apps pane.

    GlassWire-DefenderLogs.jpg

    Oh well, firewalls ain't easy...
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2025
  9. Surt

    Surt Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Posts:
    503
    Location:
    USA
    Firefox being my thing, I always have all processes for Edge blocked but occasionally ran an update when a zero day fix is reported. Or just for grins. So, prior to v3.7.880 I allowed Edge, Edge Update, and kept WebView2 blocked; those were the only three listed when using Search for "Edge" under GlassWire Protect. When Edge completed the update, I closed it and re-blocked the two.

    Now in v3.7.880, in this screenie, this is what an "Edge" search returns. A whole lot more than just Edge, Edge Update, and WebView2. This is the state of things just after an Edge update:

    GlassWireMSedge.jpg

    Edge will browse OK without issue. It will not Update with v1.3.119.39 allowed and v1.3.195.57 blocked; a "can't connect" objects. When manually reversed, connect is OK.

    I wrapped this up in an email to GW support. Wait and see.

    Sidebar: There were several blocked Edge items mirrored under Uninstalled which I cleared thinking it would remove their counterparts under Active. I was wrong and wish I had screen shotted for a before/after.
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2025
  10. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,511
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    @Surt very interesting! I went back to 3.6.859 to many issues with the newest build.

    Thanks!
     
  11. Surt

    Surt Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Posts:
    503
    Location:
    USA
    @Tripple Helix - You're welcome. I think they just drifted away from the keep-it-simple UI for the Protect feature set. Too much Domotz influence, perhaps.

    Edge and iDrive connectivity are the only apps I need to toggle on a regular basis, the latter being the manual backups I do every few days or so. (I do keep the iDrive Tray connected for notifications, etc.) So, I'm going to stay with the current version of GW.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.