Brave Browser Discussion & Update Thread

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by emmjay, Sep 2, 2016.

  1. anon

    anon Registered Member

  2. anon

    anon Registered Member

  3. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Brave browser - A rather interesting Chromium-based option

    Here comes my review of Brave, a Chromium-based browser, including look and feel, numerous privacy-related options like Shields and support for Manifest V2 extensions, cosmetic tweaks for Web pages, Web3 functionality, built-in AI assistant, Dashboard, day-to-day use, performance, stability, some small quirks, other observations, and more. Have fun.

    https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/brave-browser.html


    Cheers,
    Mrk
     
  4. anon

    anon Registered Member

  5. anon

    anon Registered Member

  6. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Brave won't update here now. I keep getting this:
     
  7. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    I ran SFC / SCANNOW, which found and fixed some corrupt files. I don't know if that fixed it, or the system restart I did just after the command, but Brave is now up to date.
     
  8. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    I would be interested,if possible, to know the score of Brave and Firefox on this test:

    https://www.browserbench.org/Speedometer3.1/

    in your Linux OS.
     
  9. wat0114

    wat0114 Registered Member

    Running Linux MX-21.

    Brave with several filter lists enabled:

    speedometer3.1-Brave.png

    Firefox with uBO extension:

    speedometer3.1-Firefox.png
     
  10. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Sampei, I don't really believe in browser benchmarks, so I'm not sure how useful the test would be.
    Mrk
     
  11. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Thank you very much for your helpfulness.
    No difference,in practice,between the 2 browsers.
     
  12. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

  13. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    My personal experience shows adblocker = massive speed improvement, noscript (used selectively and all that) = massive speed improvement, and the two combined gives the best speed boost, making any browser-specific technology irrelevant. It's about web pages and how badly they are written.
    Mrk
     
  14. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    :thumb:

    Yes what you wrote is right.
    It is visible in this graph:


    https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode

    But for the same adblock + (Noscript) it is the different browsers that make the difference.

    P.S.

    Probably the faster web page loading could also be affected by adblock MV3 compared to the same to adblock MV2 (both used in Hard Mode).
     
  15. summerheat

    summerheat Registered Member

    Actually OT in this tread but: I don't really see the need for Noscript given that it's easy in uBO to block 3rd-party scripts in Dynamic Filtering (with medium or hard mode) and even 1st-party scripts. And much more user-friendly than in Noscript.
     
  16. anon

    anon Registered Member

  17. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Brave v1.79.119 (Jun 3, 2025)
    https://brave.com/latest/
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice