AdGuard MV3 extension

At least from the title (I'd have to parse the url) your second custom filter list doesn't work in AdGuard MV3 because the $removeparam rule doesn't work.

AdGuard Cookie Notices filter has 23273 rules.
Too many rules when enabled with the 4 default lists enabled.

 

Even if not all default lists are enabled, by far not all rules from the two added lists are used. Possible there is some kind of compression or 'translation'. Otherwise it's hard to explain why these very small lists can be so effective. E.g. from the AG URL Tracking Filter are only 253 rules in use. About the $removeparam rule I only know this statement from AG:
"$removeparam does not support exclusions (~) and regular expressions (regexp)" (source: https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-mv3.html).
Overview of the rule limits:

 

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardMV3/issues/22

Run the test.

 

Where can I find this list?
TIA

 

In my eyes it's ok.:

 

Download source:
https://filters.adtidy.org/windows/filters/18.txt

 

You have to click your mouse on the various links on the test page.

 

Ha, ha, so I didn't understand you well. Tomorrow I'll be back. I've now to do something else.

 

The tests cannot be passed because the issue I opened.............. is always open.

ameshkov (Andrey Meshkov) wrote:

The most representative tests are:

• Direct navigations

Open a new tab and paste:

Code:

https://brave.com/?fbclid=1

in the URL bar. That parameter should be removed from the URL bar.

This test is passed with the default lists.
So there is no point in adding more lists.

• Cross-site tests

If you don't pass these tests from my point of view it is useless to add all other possible lists with $removeparam rules.

 

If you had said that before then I would not have made that effort. So I've deleted my post. Otherwise it causes (more) confusion.

 

You know I'm a fisherman and cats steal fish....so I'm very cautious with cats.
Cross-site testing is also important.

 

And don't forget that cats have nine lives.

 

I'm testing extensions of Adguard MV3 with uBO Lite together, both out of box settings, no tweaks, uBO complete mode, and I'm noticing no browsing slowdown or any other issues. Actually I'm pretty surprised how well they coexist. It seems that the first filters uBO and then Adguard sweeps the garbage because the uBO's counter indicates more ads blocked than the counter of AG.

Btw, what is the deciding factor which extension runs first? Is it decided by which extension is simply faster than the other one?

 

hi
nice topic
but i have read that adguard 4.1.53 is MV3 compatible , in short should do the job
does it ? is 4.1.53 really compatible ?
thanks

 

What's your source?

 

Hi,
there is no reason to use both 2 extensions simultaneously with all filters enabled.
Instead, it is possible to combine UBO Lite with only the "AdGuard URL Tracking Protection" list together with AdGuard MV3.
With only 257 rules in UBO Lite it is possible to take advantage of the feature of blocking URL's tracking parameters that currently does not work in AdGuard MV3.

 

There was a reason and that was I wanted to see how they fare along.
Anyway thanks for the info.

 

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardMV3/issues/29#issuecomment-1384350651

Almost certainly because of this:

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/mv2-sunset/

If the extension is not updated (such as filter lists) it is recommended to disable it.

 

Custom rules for not displaying Youtube cookie consent pop-up:

Code:

youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer.forceConsent, false)
youtube.com##+js(json-prune, [].response.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer)
youtube.com##+js(json-prune, topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer)
youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.onResponseReceivedEndpoints, undefined)
youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpV2Renderer, undefined)
youtube.com##+js(json-prune, [].response.overlay.consentBumpV2Renderer topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpV2Renderer overlay.consentBumpV2Renderer response.overlay.consentBumpV2Renderer)
youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.desktopTopbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpV2Renderer, undefined)

 

AdGuard AdBlocker MV3 Experimental v.0.3.19 filters update:

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/adguard-adblocker-mv3-exp/apjcbfpjihpedihablmalmbbhjpklbdf

 

I changed Kees1958's initial list to this one that has fewer rules:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K...U_US_MV3_most_common_ad+tracking_networks.txt

 

AdGuard AdBlocker MV3 Experimental v.0.3.20 (April 10, 2023) filters update available in the Chrome Web Store.

 

hi
does

Code:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Kees1958/W3C_annual_most_used_survey_blocklist/master/EU_US%2Bmost_used_ad_and_tracking_networks.txt

work well with adguard 4.1.55 ?
thanks