Avast aquired "i-dont-care-about-cookies"

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Brummelchen, Sep 15, 2022.

  1. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    The MV2 support timeline is visualized on this page.
     
  2. pegas

    pegas Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Posts:
    2,966
    Thanks! So devs can code hard until next June and from then to refine their extensions until end of next year. Plenty of time, I guess.
     
  3. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    3,367
    Location:
    Italy
    @nicolaasjan

    I had the curiosity that you read.;):)
    Many users will not be able to use all the MV3 extensions as they are used to today with MV2 extensions.:thumb:
     
  4. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    For those who are wondering what this is about:
    Feature request. :)
    I'm following that repo daily.
     
  5. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
  6. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I have installed the MV3 version 1.0.9 to test and the left click menu is correctly displayed (but no green check mark):

    Schermafdruk op 2022-11-12 18-29-46.png


    However, when I click on one of those Twitter links, this happens:

    screenshot1.png

    When disabling the extension on this site and accepting all cookies, I get the same.

    The only way for me to view the entire Twitter embedded content was to launch a clean Firefox profile with no extensions and accepting all cookies. :eek:
     
  7. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Fork is gaining momentum. :)

    screenshot1.png
     
  8. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,010
    I'm trying to find the correlation between the topic and the posts in ~5 pages now....
     
  9. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Weird, I don't have any problems when clicking on those Twitter links, so something must be wrong with Firefox. I do know that on many sites, imbedded content of Twitter, Instagram and YouTube is blocked if you don't approve of cookies. So often I needed to disable IDCAC. I don't know if uBlock Origin also played a role in this.

    Good point, but I guess what people are trying to say is that they don't trust IDCAC any longer after the Avast takeover. But perhaps it's indeed best if the posts about the ISDCAC fork get their own thread.
     
  10. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    There is nothing wrong with Firefox, because I encounter the same in Chromium, where those screenshots were from.
    The thing is, my browsers are extremely well protected against third party content. :)
    Only when I temporarily lower the protection, I can see this additional content, which most of the time isn't worth the effort.
     
  11. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    OK I see, then I misunderstood. So basically, your tracking protection is a bit too aggressive.
     
  12. reasonablePrivacy

    reasonablePrivacy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2017
    Posts:
    2,010
    Location:
    Member state of European Union
    I don't use customized uBlock in all browsers and their profiles, so sometimes automated extension is handy. I see that Ghostery is serving me lately popup about its ability to block cookie popups:
    Originally published on MediaPost, reposted by CDP Institute

    https://www.cdpinstitute.org/news/i...lly-opting-visitors-out-from-cookie-tracking/
     
  13. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    OK cool, so soon Ghostery will also be able to block these nagging cookie pop ups. I might check it out since ISDCAC doesn't support many sites.
     
  14. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Is this ISDCAC extension still working OK? I'm getting to see more and more cookie pop ups on websites.
     
  15. Stupendous Man

    Stupendous Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Posts:
    2,861
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    If websites come up with new cookie pop-ups, those need to be reported, and fixed.
    I see there are 4.1k open issues, mostly reported websites.
    The latest fixed and closed were last July.
    Also, the latest ISDCAC add-on update for Firefox was last February, but I cannot tell if the add-on would need an update to function more properly.
    I don't see many cookie pop-ups, but one reason could be that I use the EasyList/uBO Cookie Notices filter lists as well.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2023
  16. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,933
    for firefox, available since v117, active since v119 (currently beta)
    cookiebanners.service.mode
    important to read: https://github.com/mozilla/cookie-banner-rules-list

    currently used, only used to prefs
    Consent-O-Matic

    it uses an internal, updated, list like ublock.
    also ublock lists got quick fixes against google/youtube consent which bothered me last week.
     
  17. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I assumed that it used some type of global method to get rid of these messages, but they actually have to be reported? It used to work just fine, but lately I feel like I'm getting to see more and more of those silly cookie alerts. It may be a coincidence, but I doubt it.

    Word on the street is that the EU is planning to get rid of them for the most part. You will simply have to select a global setting in the browser, and then you won't be bothered again, because this is crazy stuff. But anyway, I have now enabled the EasyList/uBO Cookie Notices filter lists as well, forgot about this.
     
  18. Stupendous Man

    Stupendous Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Posts:
    2,861
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    I hope this will improve your experience, compared to ISDCAC alone.
     
  19. SouthPark

    SouthPark Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    737
    Location:
    South Park, CO
    FWIW, I find these two generic rules added to uBO eliminate a lot of cookie banners missed by IDCAC list:

    Code:
    ###onetrust-consent-sdk
    ##.ot-sdk-container
    
     
  20. Stupendous Man

    Stupendous Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Posts:
    2,861
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    The first one is part of the EasyList Cookie Notices filter list (fanboy-cookiemonster).
    I'm not sure if the second one is in some other filter list, and if so, which.
     
  21. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Yes, constant updates are required.
    (note, that the majority of the open issues are duplicates (example))

    It seems indeed abandoned now, which is a pity... :(
    See also issue #6158 (no reply from maintainer).

    Maybe I'll go back to IDCAC (recommended extension; rating 3.2 stars...)
    By Gen Digital Inc., Kiko
    (NortonLifeLock rebrands itself as Gen Digital)

    So, it's still manually reviewed by Mozilla.
     
  22. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Thanks, will add them.

    Too bad, so it's pretty much dead? But I won't go back to the old IDCAC because I don't trust them.
     
  23. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Then expect a growing number of sites showing cookie notices with ISDCAC... :(

    If IDCAC were nefarious, Mozilla would remove it from their store.

    From the addon page:
    (the last line was probably added after all the bad publicity :D)

    That said, I still keep an eye on ISDCAC to see if it revives.
     
  24. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I simply do not trust Avast anymore. I don't really care about if Mozilla thinks it trustworthy or not. And I have now also enabled certain anti-cookie alert lists in uBlock, so far no problems.
     
  25. SouthPark

    SouthPark Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    737
    Location:
    South Park, CO
    I tried the Firefox IDCAC add-on as a lark but had to uninstall it within 5 minutes because it broke barchart-dot-com, one of my most-used sites. I'm staying with PopUpOff and my own very small, curated cookie block list since I haven't been able to find a small mainstream cookie list that doesn't add 30,000+ cosmetic filters.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.