AV-Comparatives: Performance Test October 2021

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by guest, Nov 5, 2021.

  1. guest

    guest Guest

    Consumer Performance Test October 2021
    November 5, 2021
    https://www.av-comparatives.org/consumer-performance-test-october-2021/
    Article: https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/performance-test-october-2021/

    Chart: https://www.av-comparatives.org/com...2021&chart_month=10&chart_sort=1&chart_zoom=0

    PDF: https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/avc_per_2021_10.pdf
     
  2. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    2,225
    Location:
    Canada
    Very bad score for Windows Defender. Yet it does not show that much difference on my system, I was using Kaspersky before.
     
  3. Buddel

    Buddel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2015
    Posts:
    2,010
    According to this test, Kaspersky is even lighter than Eset. Well done, Eugene.:)

    As for Windows Defender - no suprise here.
     
  4. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,286
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I tested 13 others and they slowed down my systems more than WD and I have very fast computers. Those tests have a great statistical variance depending on your system. One size does not fill all.
     
  5. Azure Phoenix

    Azure Phoenix Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Posts:
    1,568
    Note that the test shows various scenarios. So besides the standard "everyone's machine is different" we often hear. You can see file copying, archiving and unarchiving, launching applications, downloading files and lastly browsing websites.

    The "browsing websites" is most likely the scenario users will focus the most to determine if an AV has slow performance. And as we can see everyone got a high score there, including Microsoft.

    The ones Microsoft fell short were in file copying (first run) and archiving/unarchiving. Not the kind of stuff most users would bother to test.


    A question. How long ago did you used Kaspersky? I'm asking because I have read from others it has recently got a big improvement in performance.
     
  6. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    I've recently uninstalled Norton on my desktop PC and installed KSC. To be honest I can't see any major difference performance wise. Usability is a different matter though. ;)
     
  7. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    9,145
    Location:
    USA
    Very true. Everyone must test and decide what works best for them.
     
  8. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    2,225
    Location:
    Canada
    I would say my license ended about 6 months ago on both my machines and since then I’m using WD. I had Kaspersky installed for at least 4 years before that and it never slow down my computers.
     
  9. Spartan

    Spartan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    1,442
    Location:
    Dubai
    I wonder why F-Secure stopped participating although they were the lightest in the previous 2 tests
     
  10. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    I'm sure that for most people, ESET will be lighter. While I'm sure that the test results accurately reflect how the products performed for them, very often my experience with antiviruses is very different to the results of performance tests.
     
  11. Nevi

    Nevi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Posts:
    29
    Location:
    Copenhagen
    I have just changed from my old Webroot, to Nod32 antivirus. I'm really surpriced so light it is. Before that I tried Kaspersky antivirus to compare. And Eset do lies in the top 1-2 regarding light performance. Webroot had to give way to Nod32. I am officially a Nod32 endorse. :rolleyes:
     
  12. JasonUK

    JasonUK Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Posts:
    112
    Location:
    UK
    Defender running solo without any other security software or hardening is noticeably slower on my WIn10 PC (about 6yrs old) than Avast Free. The only surprise to me is that it scores as 'very fast' on launching applications because I'd rank it as slow on that too :) So much depends on the machine and the software installed that any of these AVs are installed on though.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.