Windows Defender Is Becoming the Powerful Antivirus That Windows 10 Needs

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Secondmineboy, Jan 30, 2016.

  1. GrDukeMalden

    GrDukeMalden Registered Member

    See my signature. It's never let me down.
     
  2. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    How good is WD against ransomware?
     
  3. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    WD has become a top natch security suit. it has browser sandbox, system sandbox, anti-ransomware, anti-adware, anti-exploit, firewall, anti-malware , anti-virus, and anti-exe. Too bad they are in pro and above.
     
  4. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Very true buddy I will run it with roguekiller
     
  5. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    I think running it with MBAM free would be better. For on-demand scan wise. Roguekiller on-demand detection is not that great compared to MBAM free. WD in win 10 pro has solid protection and MBAm free has great scanning detection rate. do not use MBAM pro with WD since MBAM pro turns WD off.
     
  6. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Ah I see
     
  7. digmor crusher

    digmor crusher Registered Member

    There's a setting in MBAM that allows it to run in real time without shutting WD off.
     
  8. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    That's good news my friend;)
     
  9. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    realy where? I must have missed it. can you tell us where it is?
     
  10. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Settings > Security > scroll down to Windows Security Center > disable Always register Malwarebytes in the Windows Security Center.
     
  11. rollers

    rollers Registered Member

    Running that very setup myself now. Works like a charm
     
  12. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    thanks.
     
  13. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    using WD harden only on a backup windows 10 pro (for windows games only) mini-pc.
     
  14. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    yeah. Main mini-pc is linux mint. living room mini-pc is chrome OS and now a backup mini-pc with win pro for game and another mini-pc in reserve with linux. lol
     
  15. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    I am ****** at AMD. They tricked me. I will buy intel in the future.
     
  16. taleblou

    taleblou Registered Member

    I had saved some money to buy a brand new generation pc with the latest ryzen gen chip and when their 4th gen came out and bought it in a mini-pc . As soon as I bought the new 4th gen ryzen AMD processor (not even a month passed) mini-pc then they announced the 5th gen ryzen processor. If they had announced that the 4th gen was temporary then I would wait and get the 5th ryzen instead of wasting it on a 4th gen.
    I had saved some money to buy a brand new generation pc with the latest ryzen gen chip and when their 4th gen came out and bought it in a mini-pc . As soon as I bought the new 4th gen ryzen AMD processor (not even a month passed) mini-pc then they announced the 5th gen ryzen processor. If they had announced that the 4th gen was temporary then I would wait and get the 5th gen ryzen instead of wasting it on a 4th gen.
     
  17. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    OK cool, so the engine can be updated together with signatures, without having to download a full update via Windows Update.

    If services related to Win Update are disabled then it's indeed game over. I also believe that M$ should redesign it so that Win Defender isn't affected. Not sure if Tamper Protection takes care of this, I'm guessing it does not since several third party tools are capable of disabling Windows Update.
     
  18. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Here we go again with the strangely fast "Quick Scan." Now typically, this scan has been in the 20-30 sec range for 32,000+ items. After installing the 21H1 Windows 10 (insiders beta), now look at it.
    image_2021-02-17_213942.png

    Anyone else? These variations, no wonder I depend on my third parties for reality checks.
    Although, there's been no changelog for 21H1 yet, but they said it wouldn't be anything major. So any optimizing of Defender scans is still up in the air.
     
  19. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Capture.PNG My quick scan on 21H1
     
  20. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Thank you for checking. Today, I ran a Defender quick scan and this is the result. Like I said, glad I have third parties to rely on. :rolleyes: :cautious:

    image_2021-02-18_072220.png
     
  21. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    and those 3rd parties are?
     
  22. plat

    plat Registered Member

    AdwCleaner and paid HitmanPro. AdwC just came out with a much faster scan due to use of multi-threading. At first, it occurred to me that AdwC had sprinkled some fairy dust on Defender; hence the supersonic scan time. :argh:

    Defender is nice but sometimes you gotta have a backup for verification. :)
     
  23. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    thanks plat. never used adw but hmp is pretty good.
     
  24. chrcol

    chrcol Registered Member

    This I feel is dangerous. I do cringe a little when the typical thought process from your average computer user is "keep up to the date and you all good".

    Patches to fix vulnerabilities are always behind the curve, its a reaction approach.

    Having extra security layers for a "just in case" scenario is what is going to protect you against zero day. I read an article not long ago which was a real eye opener, It was a flaw in windows, where Microsoft initially patched it after weeks of the malware running rampant, but the fix was a lazy one, it didnt fix the core issue but instead just stopped that specific exploit, because of the attacker merely needed to tweak the exploit and it was rampant again. This happened 2-3 times before it was finally fixed properly.

    I would even go as far to say that someone with a really locked down OS that hasnt been patched for say 3 years is probably less vulnerable to someone running OOB config and patched up to date.
     
  25. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    It's not dangerous at all. As I keep posting, if you keep your system updated and are always very careful about what files you open, then it is very hard to get infected. You can choose to keep believing otherwise if you want, but my opinion is based on decades of my own experience and countless hours spent reading posts on security forums.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2021
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice