Windows Defender Is Becoming the Powerful Antivirus That Windows 10 Needs

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Secondmineboy, Jan 30, 2016.

  1. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Posts:
    4,208
    it did? didn't know that. back then i was a toddler. :oops:
     
  2. lucd

    lucd Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2018
    Posts:
    782
    Location:
    Island of Woman
    I don't trust it either, re-image is not such a great idea, wiping is better (zeroes should be enough) from a Linux based pendrive perhaps changing router or factory reset/at least flashing it, Windows firewall to something better, it needs re-vamping and harden win 10, lot still sucks but we are getting there with Microsoft, they made a huge leap forward
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2020
  3. StealthyTrojan

    StealthyTrojan Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2020
    Posts:
    24
    Location:
    Portugal
    Windows Defender is a disaster.

    https://youtu.be/VXtTgP8JkSk

    https://youtu.be/N4Vex7l8jv4
     
  4. Bertazzoni

    Bertazzoni Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    Posts:
    657
    Location:
    Milan, Italia
    @StealthyTrojan TPSC testing is a joke! :argh::argh::argh:

    Edit: See especially his Windows Defender Sandbox video. He has no idea what its purpose is. :eek::eek::eek:
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2020
  5. B-boy/StyLe/

    B-boy/StyLe/ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    518
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Actually on the second link you posted WD did great...The error message at the end can be ignored as the entry can be easily removed from the startup location.
     
  6. StealthyTrojan

    StealthyTrojan Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2020
    Posts:
    24
    Location:
    Portugal
    @B-boy/StyLe/ Easily removed... hm, if you say so. But the first was really bad, I still can't trust WD. What he did for the second video affects performance a lot, and I'm guessing it will cause many false-positives. The windows default is always the first thing that malware creators will try to bypass.
     
  7. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,787
    The past few days I have been using WD, after using Configure Defender to set protection to MAX. No high resource usage, no false positives yet, etc.. Prior to testing MAX, I had it set to HIGH for several months with no issues. And as others pointed out, WD did great in that second test after he tweaked the settings. If you don't like it, that's fine, but WD has been testing really well by most professional services. AV-Test, AV Comparatives, etc...
     
  8. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,617
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    A disaster for some maybe, it looks good to me. who is going to be attacked by 860 instances of malware? Any AV is bound to have some problems under these circumstances, but as clocks pointed out WD has been getting good results when tested by professional labs. Besides, if malware would ever slip through and encrypt whatever, a simple reboot would suffice in my system, and if that would fail (I doubt it), restoring an image would take less than 3 minutes to go back to safety.

    IMO an AV is an alarm system that should warn you about an impending attack whether it succeeds or fails, a restore is definitely needed to flash out any leftover malware. My daughter is 12 years old and has been using her first Win10 laptop for about three months now. She clicks on anything like most children do, but WD has been protecting quite well so far, I check her system every month with Eset online scanner and Hitman Pro with no issues, however I have installed Macrium on her system just in case things might go south one day...
     
  9. Pain of Salvation

    Pain of Salvation Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    399
    Does setting ConfigureDefender on high affects peformance?
     
  10. Bertazzoni

    Bertazzoni Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    Posts:
    657
    Location:
    Milan, Italia
    Machine performance? or Windows Defender performance? If it's the latter, then no because it sets a lower cloud block level and disables the 3 most problematic ASR rules. You will be able to use it problem-free. "High" is the recommended setting.

    OTOH, WD will always slow copying large amounts of files because it lacks scan caching. Otherwise, machine performance is very good.
     
  11. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,359
    Amateur testing is a disaster. :D
     
  12. StealthyTrojan

    StealthyTrojan Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2020
    Posts:
    24
    Location:
    Portugal
    Other free antivirus did great. And "amateur" testing isn't necessarily worse or less accurate than "professional".
     
  13. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
  14. Azure Phoenix

    Azure Phoenix Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Posts:
    1,560
    Regardless if the procedure is bad or not. One advantage YouTube testing has over professional test is that you can actually see the test.

    You can see much more of the procedure than with testing labs

    This makes it easier to analyze and scrutinize.
     
  15. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,008
  16. cheater87

    cheater87 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Posts:
    3,291
    Location:
    Pennsylvania.
    Get a sandbox on there.
     
  17. Sm3K3R

    Sm3K3R Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts:
    611
    Location:
    Wallachia
    I ve taken a look at the ransomwere test linked in some upper post.
    That s bad performance.
    The behaviour is strange even with the eicar test files.And it s slooww..
    I ve stopped using it .
    With or without it s the same for me.
     
  18. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Got an update to the Antimalware Platform via Windows Update a little while ago. KB 4052623. New version is 4.18.2006.6.
     
  19. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,099
    Location:
    UK
    https://www.microsoft.com/security/...osoft-defender-atp-protection-to-a-new-level/
     
  20. guest

    guest Guest

    Microsoft Defender ATP now helps secure network devices
    July 2, 2020
    https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/ne...efender-atp-now-helps-secure-network-devices/
     
  21. guest

    guest Guest

    Microsoft Defender ATP web content filtering is now free
    July 6, 2020
    https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/ne...fender-atp-web-content-filtering-is-now-free/
     
  22. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
  23. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,644
    Location:
    USA
    I'd like to see it in action. I've never seen Defender do anything but randomly delete files.
     
  24. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Posts:
    4,208
    ms should acquire avira. :ninja:
     
  25. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,507
    Wow really? I have never had that happen (yet). Sounds like good old Norton lol.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.