From that article, I think it could also have the opposite effect - too many alerts that amount to nothing to the user could cause people to become complacent or have no sense of urgency - the boy who cried "wolf" syndrome. IMO, those alerts would have be very narrowly focused to the few houses surrounding mine, or for apartments in the same building - or it is just going to cause one (or both) of those two problems mentioned.
"Amazon's helping police build a surveillance network with Ring doorbells Its popular Ring smart doorbells mean more cameras on more doorsteps, where surveillance footage used to be rare... While residential neighborhoods aren't usually lined with security cameras, the smart doorbell's popularity has essentially created private surveillance networks powered by Amazon and promoted by police departments. Police departments across the country, from major cities like Houston to towns with fewer than 30,000 people, have offered free or discounted Ring doorbells to citizens, sometimes using taxpayer funds to pay for Amazon's products. While Ring owners are supposed to have a choice on providing police footage, in some giveaways, police require recipients to turn over footage when requested. Ring said Tuesday that it would start cracking down on those strings attached... While more surveillance footage in neighborhoods could help police investigate crimes, the sheer number of cameras run by Amazon's Ring business raises questions about privacy involving both law enforcement and tech giants... 'What we have here is a perfect marriage between law enforcement and one of the world's biggest companies creating conditions for a society that few people would want to be a part of,' said Mohammad Tajsar, staff attorney at the ACLU of Southern California..." https://www.cnet.com/features/amazo...d-a-surveillance-network-with-ring-doorbells/
That articles is not entirely correct. You can certainly give it to them voluntarily, but they cannot force you to give it to them. They still need a court order - though they may not be upfront about that. But in reality, a court order actually protects the police too, at least in major crimes, as it helps establish the "chain of evidence". The bigger problem, as I see it, is you may end up spying on your innocent neighbors. Let's say your neighbor's wife suddenly, without notifying you, vanishes for 4 weeks. You don't know that she left to care for a sick parent. Then you notice your security camera picked up the husband and another man struggling to toss a rolled up rug in the back of his truck. He comes back an hour later and the rug is gone so you call the cops. SWAT swarms the house and the man's place of work and it takes hours to sort it out. But in the process, the falsely accursed is shamed, embarrassed and may even lose his job. So the problem with those ring doorbells, for example, is they point out - and therefore may pick up more than just your home.
1.It would be a matter of contract -- The police could threaten to uninstall the Ring or charge the homeowner for the price of the Ring. 2. If the tape was critical the Police could go to court seeking "Specific Performance: of the contract.
Yes, but that is not the same as forcing you to turn over the recorded data. Also true. And they surely would get the warrant too if they had "reasonable cause" to believe there was evidence recorded on that system. And to that, it means if you know the police wanted your recording and you destroyed the recording before they could get their warrant - you might be in trouble for tampering with or destroying evidence. FTR, I NOT saying these surveillance programs are bad. In fact, am certain in many neighborhoods and certainly for many crimes, they can be invaluable in the interest of putting the bad guys away forever. And they may be great just for "peace of mind" which in itself is a good thing. I am just saying make sure you know what you getting into. Learn your rights and your obligations before jumping in. And make sure you are no infringing on the rights and privacy of neighbors without their full knowledge and consent.
https://www.cnet.com/features/amazo...d-a-surveillance-network-with-ring-doorbells/ Having video available to help police can be a good thing but this is taking it too far. Cops should have to request the video from the camera owners, not have instant access to it without notification. "Here's a free doorbell camera! Just click the ACCEPT button at the bottom of the page and it's all yours!"
Here's The Most Complete Map So Far Of Amazon's Ring Camera Surveillance Partnerships With Local Police
Amazon Requires Police to Shill Surveillance Cameras in Secret Agreement The Lakeland, Florida police department is required to “encourage adoption” of Ring products as part of a secret agreement with the company July 25, 2019 https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...hill-surveillance-cameras-in-secret-agreement
Amazon’s Ring reportedly partners with more than 200 US police departments Law enforcement across the country works with Ring July 29, 2019 https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/29/20746156/amazons-ring-law-enforcement-partnerships
Everything Cops Say About Amazon's Ring Is Scripted or Approved by Ring July 30, 2019 https://gizmodo.com/everything-cops-say-about-amazons-ring-is-scripted-or-a-1836812538
Amazon Ring: Police tie-up criticised by anti-surveillance campaigners August 1, 2019 https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49191005
Cops Are Offering Ring Doorbell Cameras in Exchange for Info https://www.wired.com/story/cops-offering-ring-doorbell-cameras-for-information/
Amazon's Ring Is Teaching Cops How to Persuade Customers to Hand Over Surveillance Footage August 6, 2019 https://gizmodo.com/amazons-ring-is-teaching-cops-how-to-persuade-customers-1837000515
"This Map Shows If Your Town's Police Are Tapped Into Ring's Surveillance Network..." https://gizmodo.com/this-map-shows-if-your-towns-police-are-tapped-into-rin-1837079976
Ring Told People to Snitch on Their Neighbors in Exchange for Free Stuff August 9, 2019 https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...on-their-neighbors-in-exchange-for-free-stuff
Ring asks police not to tell public how its law enforcement backend works Ring asks cops not to call its security cameras "security cameras" in public August 21, 2019 https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...ance-products-surveillance-ring-tells-police/
How Amazon convinces police to join the Ring network https://www.cnet.com/news/how-amazon-convinces-police-to-join-ring/
Ring reportedly shared video sharing data, detailed maps with police in 2018 The company says the reports do not reflect its "current policies." August 30, 2019 https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...aring-data-detailed-maps-with-police-in-2018/
Senator pushes Amazon for details about Ring “partnerships” with police September 5, 2019 https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...-details-about-ring-partnerships-with-police/
Amazon's Ring wanted to use 911 calls to activate its video doorbells https://www.cnet.com/news/amazons-ring-wanted-to-use-911-calls-to-activate-its-video-doorbells/
Amazon Is Marketing Face Recognition to Police Departments Partnered With Ring: Report October 15, 2019 https://gizmodo.com/amazon-is-marketing-face-recognition-to-police-departme-1839073749